Maintaining Systematic Literature Reviews: Benefits and Drawbacks

被引:3
|
作者
Nepomuceno, Vilmar [1 ]
Soares, Sergio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, CIn, IFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Pernambuco, CIn, ISI, TICs, Recife, PE, Brazil
关键词
Systematic Literature Review; Maintenance; Traceability; Evidence Based Software Engineering;
D O I
10.1145/3239235.3267432
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background: Maintenance and traceability (versioning) are constant concerns in Software Engineering (SE), however, few works related to these topics in Systematic Literature Reviews (SLR) were found. Goal: The goal of this research is to elucidate how SLRs can be maintained and what are the benefits and drawbacks in this process. Method: This work presents a survey where experienced researchers that conducted SLRs between 2011 and 2015 answered questions about maintenance and traceability and, using software maintenance concepts, it addresses the SLRs maintenance process. From the 79 e-mails sent we reach 28 answers. Results: 19 of surveyed researchers have shown interest in keeping their SLRs up-to-date, but they have expressed concerns about the effort to be made to accomplish it. It was also observed that 20 participants would be willing to share their SLRs in common repositories, such as GitHub. Conclusions: There is a need to perform maintenance on SLRs. Thus, we are proposing a SLR maintenance process, taking into account some benefits and drawbacks identified during our study and presented through the paper.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits
    Mahood, Quenby
    Van Eerd, Dwayne
    Irvin, Emma
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2014, 5 (03) : 221 - 234
  • [2] A Review of the Literature on the Benefits and Drawbacks of Participatory Action Research
    Bennett, Marlyn
    FIRST PEOPLES CHILD & FAMILY REVIEW, 2019, 14 (01) : 109 - 122
  • [3] Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
    Ingrid Eshun-Wilson
    Shahista Jaffer
    Rhodine Smith
    Samuel Johnson
    Paul Hine
    Alberto Mateo
    Anne-Marie Stephani
    Paul Garner
    Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [4] Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
    Eshun-Wilson, Ingrid
    Jaffer, Shahista
    Smith, Rhodine
    Johnson, Samuel
    Hine, Paul
    Mateo, Alberto
    Stephani, Anne-Marie
    Garner, Paul
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [5] Systematic literature reviews
    White, A
    Schmidt, K
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2005, 13 (01) : 54 - 60
  • [6] Literature reviews vs systematic reviews
    Robinson, Priscilla
    Lowe, John
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 39 (02) : 103 - 103
  • [7] Systematic Literature Reviews
    Lowe, Nancy K.
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2009, 38 (04): : 375 - 376
  • [8] Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review
    van Dinter, Raymon
    Tekinerdogan, Bedir
    Catal, Cagatay
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 136
  • [9] On the benefits of systematic reviews for wildlife parasitology
    Haddaway, Neal R.
    Watson, Maggie J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY-PARASITES AND WILDLIFE, 2016, 5 (02): : 184 - 191
  • [10] Sustainable systematic literature reviews
    dos Santos, Vinicius
    Iwazaki, Anderson Y.
    Felizardo, Katia R.
    de Souza, Érica F.
    Nakagawa, Elisa Y.
    Information and Software Technology, 2024, 176