Comparison between chemoradiation protocol intended for organ preservation and conventional surgery for clinical T1-T2 esophageal carcinoma

被引:49
|
作者
Murakami, M
Kuroda, Y
Nakajima, T
Okamoto, Y
Mizowaki, T
Kusumi, F
Hajiro, K
Nishimura, S
Matsusue, S
Takeda, H
机构
[1] Tenri Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tenri, Nara 6320015, Japan
[2] Tenri Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Tenri, Nara 6320015, Japan
[3] Tenri Hosp, Dept Abdominal Surg, Tenri, Nara 6320015, Japan
关键词
esophageal carcinoma; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; surgery; combined modality therapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00171-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This retrospective study was designed to compare treatment results of the chemoradiation protocol with conventional surgery for thoracic T1-T2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods and Materials: Sixty-six patients with esophageal carcinoma, clinically diagnosed as T1 (tumor invading lamina propria or submucosa) or T2 (tumor invading muscularis propria) were treated for 12 consecutive years, from July 1986 to January 1998. The conventional surgery group included 30 patients who underwent esophagectomy with regional lymph node dissection. Twenty-one of them received postoperative radiotherapy. Thirty-six patients were assigned to the chemoradiation protocol, consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (44 Gy; CDDP: 60 mg/m(2), day 1, bolus; 5-FU: 400 mg/m(2), day 1-4, continuous), followed by either definitive radiotherapy with high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (total 70 Gy) for responders or surgery for nonresponders as in the conventional surgery group. Surgical candidates in both groups received intraoperative radiotherapy for abdominal lymphatics since 1991. Results: In the protocol group, 4 patients underwent radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and the remaining 32 underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy. Local control rates at 1 and 3 years were 85% and 70% in the T1/protocol group versus 91% and 80% in the T1/surgery group, and 83% and 83% in the T2/protocol group versus 94% and 80% in the T2/surgery group, respectively. There was no statistical significance. Overall 1- and 3-year survival rates were 100% and 83% in the T1/protocol group versus 82% and 72% in the T1/surgery group (p = 0.36), and 100% and 51% in the T2/protocol group, versus 95% and 68% in the T2/surgery group (p = 0.61), respectively. There was no treatment-related mortality in either group. The rates of esophageal conservation were 92% in the T1/protocol group and 58% in the T2/protocol group. Conclusion: The chemoradiation protocol can result in comparable survival with conventional surgery for patients with T1-T2 esophageal carcinoma. A randomized trial between definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery is required. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 284
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Organ preservation with radiotherapy for t1-t2 carcinoma of the pyriform sinus
    Rabbani, A. N.
    Hinerman, R.
    Morris, C. G.
    Amdur, R. J.
    Mendenhall, W. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S197 - S197
  • [2] Organ preservation with radiotherapy for T1-T2 carcinoma of the pyriform sinus
    Amdur, RJ
    Mendenhall, WM
    Stringer, SP
    Villaret, DB
    Cassisi, NJ
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2001, 23 (05): : 353 - 362
  • [3] Impact of concomitant chemoradiation therapy for T1-T2 anal canal carcinoma
    Peignaux, K.
    Azria, D.
    Zouhair, A.
    Lorchel, F.
    Truc, G.
    Chauffert, B.
    Crehange, G.
    Bosset, J.
    Maingon, P.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : 102 - 102
  • [4] Radiotherapy versus surgery for early T1-T2 glottic carcinoma
    Mlynarek, Alex
    Kost, Karen
    Gesser, Ruth
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 35 (06): : 413 - 419
  • [5] Differences in Functional and Survival Outcomes Between Patients Receiving Primary Surgery vs Chemoradiation Therapy for Treatment of T1-T2 Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Amin, Dev R. R.
    Philips, Ramez
    Bertoni, Dylan G. G.
    Mastrolonardo, Eric V. V.
    Campbell, Daniel J. J.
    Agarwal, Aarti M. M.
    Tekumalla, Sruti
    Urdang, Zachary D. D.
    Luginbuhl, Adam J. J.
    Cognetti, David M. M.
    Curry, Joseph M. M.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2023, 149 (11) : 980 - 986
  • [6] Clinical behavior of T1-T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity
    Cariati, Paolo
    Pampin Ozan, Daniel
    Gonzalez Corcoles, Costantin
    Tursun, Ramzey
    Pena Barreno, Marta
    Ferrari, Silvano
    Arroyo Rodriguez, Susana
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 48 (12) : 1152 - 1157
  • [7] T1-T2 CARCINOMA OF THE GLOTTIS - RELATIVE HYPOFRACTIONATION
    RANDALL, ME
    SPRINGER, DJ
    RABEN, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1991, 179 (02) : 569 - 571
  • [8] T1-T2 VOCAL CORD CARCINOMA - A BASIS FOR COMPARING THE RESULTS OF RADIOTHERAPY AND SURGERY
    MENDENHALL, WM
    PARSONS, JT
    STRINGER, SP
    CASSISI, NJ
    MILLION, RR
    HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1988, 10 (06): : 373 - 377
  • [9] Transoral Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of T1-T2 Carcinoma of the Larynx: Preliminary Study
    Lallemant, Benjamin
    Chambon, Guillaume
    Garrel, Renaud
    Kacha, Sophie
    Rupp, Damien
    Galy-Bernadoy, Camille
    Chapuis, Heliette
    Lallemant, Jean-Gabriel
    Huy Trang Pham
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2013, 123 (10): : 2485 - 2490
  • [10] Treatment results of esophageal carcinoma of clinical T3, T4M0: Historical comparison between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery or definitive radiotherapy and conventional surgery
    Murakami, M
    Kuroda, Y
    Matsusue, S
    Okamoto, Y
    Nakajima, T
    Nishimura, S
    Kusumi, F
    Hajiro, K
    Takeda, H
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2000, 7 (03) : 571 - 578