The impact of connection density on scale-free distribution in random networks

被引:10
|
作者
Yang, Xu-Hua [1 ]
Chen, Guang [1 ]
Chen, Sheng-Yong [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Radiol, Cambridge CB2 0SP, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Scale-free network; Self-organized; Non-growth; Connection density; COMPLEX; BEHAVIOR; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2013.01.038
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Preferential attachment is considered as a fundamental mechanism that contributes to the scale-free characteristics of random networks, which include growth and non-growth networks. There exist some situations of non-growth random networks, particularly for very sparse or dense networks, where preferential attachments cannot consequentially result in true scale-free features, but only in scale-free-like appearances. This phenomenon implies that, a close relationship exists between the connection density p and the scaling. In this study, we propose a self-organized model with constant network size to study the phenomenon. We show analytically and numerically that there exists a certain critical point p(c). Only when p = p(c), the random network evolves into steady scale-free state. Otherwise, the network exhibits a steady scale-free-like state. The closer the p approximates p(c), the closer the scale-free-like distribution approximates the true scale-free distribution. Our results show that, in random network lack of growth, a preferential scheme does not necessarily lead to a scale-free state, and a formation of scale-free is a consequence of two mechanisms: (i) a preferential scheme and (ii) appropriate connection density. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2547 / 2554
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sparse connection density underlies the maximal functional difference between random and scale-free networks
    Sheng-Jun Wang
    Zi-Gang Huang
    Xin-Jian Xu
    Ying-Hai Wang
    The European Physical Journal B, 2013, 86
  • [2] Sparse connection density underlies the maximal functional difference between random and scale-free networks
    Wang, Sheng-Jun
    Huang, Zi-Gang
    Xu, Xin-Jian
    Wang, Ying-Hai
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2013, 86 (10):
  • [3] Random models of scale-free networks
    Geng, XM
    Li, Q
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2005, 356 (2-4) : 554 - 562
  • [4] Clustering of random scale-free networks
    Colomer-de-Simon, Pol
    Boguna, Marian
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2012, 86 (02)
  • [5] Overpayment distribution in scale-free networks
    Rong, Zhi Hai
    Li, Xiang
    Wang, Xiao Fan
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-7, 2007, : 1544 - 1548
  • [6] Wealth distribution in scale-free networks
    Souma, W
    Fujiwara, Y
    Aoyama, H
    MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS VIA AGENT-BASED SIMULATION, 2003, : 37 - 49
  • [7] Gradient networks on uncorrelated random scale-free networks
    Pan, Gui-Jun
    Yan, Xiao-Qing
    Huang, Zhong-Bing
    Ma, Wei-Chuan
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2011, 83 (03)
  • [8] Immunization for scale-free networks by random walker
    Hu Ke
    Tang Yi
    CHINESE PHYSICS, 2006, 15 (12): : 2782 - 2787
  • [9] Random continuous model of scale-free networks
    Xianmin Geng
    Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2011, 24 : 218 - 224
  • [10] Scale-free networks generated by random walkers
    Saramäki, J
    Kaski, K
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2004, 341 (1-4) : 80 - 86