A Flexible Approach for the Reinforcement of Water Networks Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Cunha, Maria [1 ]
Marques, Joao [1 ]
Savic, Dragan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, INESC Coimbra Inst Syst Engn & Comp Coimbra, Dept Civil Engn, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] KWR Watercycle Res Inst, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[3] Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, Sch Engn Comp & Math, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词
Water networks; Scenario-based reinforcement; Phased intervention schemes; Flexible-robust solutions; MCDA non-compensatory and compensatory methods; Stability intervals; DEEP UNCERTAINTY; PHASED DESIGN; PROMETHEE; FUTURE; REHABILITATION; ALTERNATIVES; OPTIMIZATION; ADAPTATION; RESILIENCE; RANKING;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-020-02655-9
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This work proposes a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) as a useful tool for supporting interventions to overcome problems faced by water utilities due to inadequate network hydraulic capacity. Urban population growth and ageing infrastructure have brought new challenges at a time of mounting preoccupations with high consumer expectations of water services. The proposed MCDA approach uses four criteria to assess the performance of a set of alternative designs for the reinforcement of existing water networks. The traditional formulations that only consider a single-phase fixed plan are replaced with a flexible and robust design approach able to deal with uncertainty related to future demand changes. For this purpose, a phased planning horizon scheme is proposed that considers various possible future demands that the network might have to cope with during its lifespan. After implementing the solution for the first phase, the reinforcements foreseen for the next phases can be reassessed if new information becomes available. The procedure can be repeated up to the last phase. This means that the infrastructure is prepared from the outset to deal with circumstances to change as time unfolds. The results for a specific case study show that the value of MCDA lies in the insightful information that it provides for decision makers.
引用
收藏
页码:4469 / 4490
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Flexible Approach for the Reinforcement of Water Networks Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Maria Cunha
    João Marques
    Dragan Savić
    Water Resources Management, 2020, 34 : 4469 - 4490
  • [2] Strategic rehabilitation planning of piped water networks using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Scholten, Lisa
    Scheidegger, Andreas
    Reichert, Peter
    Mauer, Max
    Lienert, Judit
    WATER RESEARCH, 2014, 49 : 124 - 143
  • [3] Decision of the water shortage mitigation policy using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Si-Jung Choi
    Joong Hoon Kim
    Dong-Ryul Lee
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2012, 16 : 247 - 253
  • [4] Decision of the Water Shortage Mitigation Policy Using Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
    Choi, Si-Jung
    Kim, Joong Hoon
    Lee, Dong-Ryul
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2012, 16 (02) : 247 - 253
  • [5] Cost Analysis of Water Quality Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Moosavian, Seyed Farhan
    Borzuei, Daryoosh
    Ahmadi, Abolfazl
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (12) : 4843 - 4862
  • [6] Cost Analysis of Water Quality Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Seyed Farhan Moosavian
    Daryoosh Borzuei
    Abolfazl Ahmadi
    Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 4843 - 4862
  • [7] Resilience and load balancing in Fog networks: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis approach
    Ebrahim, Maad
    Hafid, Abdelhakim
    MICROPROCESSORS AND MICROSYSTEMS, 2023, 101
  • [8] A multi-criteria decision making approach for the selection of a flexible packaging equipment
    Cristea, Ciprian
    Cristea, Maria
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING AND SOLUTIONS IN MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING 2016 - COSME'16, 2017, 94
  • [9] Using multi-criteria decision analysis to assess the vulnerability of drinking water utilities
    Joerin, Florent
    Cool, Genevieve
    Rodriguez, Manuel J.
    Gignac, Marc
    Bouchard, Christian
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2010, 166 (1-4) : 313 - 330
  • [10] Using multi-criteria decision analysis to assess the vulnerability of drinking water utilities
    Florent Joerin
    Geneviève Cool
    Manuel J. Rodriguez
    Marc Gignac
    Christian Bouchard
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2010, 166 : 313 - 330