Discourses in Ecosystem Accounting: A Survey of the Expert Community

被引:18
|
作者
Bordt, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Geog Environm & Geomat, 75 Laurier Ave E, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] 64 Arbordale Crescent, Ottawa, ON K2G 5C9, Canada
关键词
Classification; Convergence; Critical Natural Capital; Environmental Accounting; Environmental Policy; Frameworks; SERVICES; FRAMEWORK; CONSENSUS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.032
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
National ecosystem accounting is an emerging framework for measuring the links between ecosystems and human well-being for national planning. It directly addresses Sustainable Development Goal 15.9, in which countries have agreed to integrate ecosystem values into national planning. The community of practice for national ecosystem accounting includes not only the international and national researchers who develop such a framework, but also the national analysts who implement it and the decision makers who apply it. To foster convergence within this community on such a common measurement platform, it is first necessary to understand the issues of divergence of values and preferences among the diverse and international ethical perspectives, disciplines and roles involved. A cluster analysis of a survey of 131 expert stakeholders in national ecosystem accounting reveals agreement within this community on the need for broadening the scope, addressing multiple decision contexts and mainstreaming national ecosystem accounting in national planning. The most important sources of divergence in this community of practice are attributed to ethical positions regarding monetization of ecosystem services, differences in the interpretation of several core concepts, such as biodiversity and ecosystem services, and the role of spatial analysis. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 99
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Survey on Expert Recommendation in Community Question Answering
    Xianzhi Wang
    Chaoran Huang
    Lina Yao
    Boualem Benatallah
    Manqing Dong
    Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2018, 33 : 625 - 653
  • [2] A Survey on Expert Recommendation in Community Question Answering
    Wang, Xianzhi
    Huang, Chaoran
    Yao, Lina
    Benatallah, Boualem
    Dong, Manqing
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 33 (04) : 625 - 653
  • [3] ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS IN ACCOUNTING DATABASES - SURVEY AND EXTENSIONS
    OLEARY, DE
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 1991, 3 (01) : 143 - 152
  • [4] Understanding cultural ecosystem services related to farmlands: Expert survey in Europe
    Balazsi, Agnes
    Danhardt, Juliana
    Collins, Sue
    Schweiger, Oliver
    Settele, Josef
    Hartel, Tibor
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 100
  • [5] ACCOUNTING AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT OF ENTERPRICE SECURITY ON ANTIQUES MARKET (EXPERIENCE OF EXPERT SURVEY)
    Shvets, V
    Demkiv, K.
    FINANCIAL AND CREDIT ACTIVITY-PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 2 (19): : 107 - 113
  • [6] ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE AND BIG 6 ACCOUNTING - A SURVEY OF THE CURRENT USES OF EXPERT SYSTEMS IN THE MODERN ACCOUNTING ENVIRONMENT
    CHASE, MD
    SHIM, JK
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1991, 21 (1-4) : 205 - 209
  • [7] Accounting without accounting Informational proxies and the construction of organisational discourses
    Frezatti, Fabio
    Carter, David B.
    Barroso, Marcelo F. G.
    ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2014, 27 (03): : 426 - 464
  • [8] Ecosystem accounting in the Netherlands
    Hein, Lars
    Remme, Roy P.
    Schenau, Sjoerd
    Bogaart, Patrick W.
    Lof, Marjolein E.
    Horlings, Edwin
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 44
  • [9] Assessing governance challenges of local biodiversity and ecosystem services: Barriers identified by the expert community
    Shih, Wan-Yu
    Mabon, Leslie
    Puppim de Oliveira, Jose A.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 91
  • [10] The endogenous construction of accounting discourses in a trade union
    Panozzo F.
    Zan L.
    Journal of Management and Governance, 1999, 3 (1) : 49 - 79