How do novices learn physical examination skills? A systematic review of the literature

被引:17
|
作者
Danielson, Aaron R. [1 ]
Venugopal, Sandhya [2 ]
Mefford, Jason M. [3 ]
Clarke, Samuel O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Emergency Med, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Div Cardiovasc Med, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente, Dept Emergency Med, Santa Clara, CA USA
来源
MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE | 2019年 / 24卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Systematic review; physical examination; medical student; preclinical; teaching; MUSCULOSKELETAL CLINICAL SKILLS; SENIOR MEDICAL-STUDENTS; STANDARDIZED PATIENTS; EDUCATION RESEARCH; PERFORMANCE; DIAGNOSIS; QUALITY; EXAM; AUSCULTATION; INSTRUCTORS;
D O I
10.1080/10872981.2019.1608142
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Physical Examination (PE) skills are vital for patient care, and many medical students receive their first introduction to them in their pre-clinical years. A substantial amount of curriculum time is devoted to teaching these skills in most schools. Little is known about the best way to introduce PE skills to novice learners. Objective: Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of how medical students are first taught PE skills and the evidence supporting these strategies. Design: We searched ERIC, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE for descriptions of complete PE curricula for novice learners. Inclusion criteria were: (1) English language; (2) subjects were enrolled in medical school and were in the preclinical portion of their training; (3) description of a method to teach physical examination skills for the first time; (4) description of the study population; (5) Description of a complete PE curriculum. We used the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) score to evaluate the quality of evidence provided. Results: Our search returned 5,418 articles; 32 articles met our inclusion criteria. Two main types of curricula were reported: comprehensive 'head-to-toe' PE curricula (18%) and organ system-based curricula (41%). No studies compared these directly, and only two evaluated trainees' clinical performance. The rest of the articles described interventions used across curricula (41%). Median MERSQI score was 10.1 Interquartile range 8.1-12.4. We found evidence for the use of non-faculty teaching associates, technology-enhanced PE education, and the addition of clinical exposure to formal PE teaching. Conclusions: The current literature on teaching PE is focused on describing innovations to head-to-toe and organ system-based curricula rather than their relative effectiveness, and is further limited by its reliance on short-term outcomes. The optimal strategy for novice PE instruction remains unknown.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How do we learn in and from Hackathons? A systematic literature review
    Schulten, Cleo
    Chounta, Irene-Angelica
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 29 (15) : 20103 - 20134
  • [2] How Do Children Think They Learn Skills in Physical Education?
    Koekoelk, Jeroen
    Knoppers, Annelies
    Stegeman, Harry
    JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 28 (03) : 310 - 332
  • [3] Physical examination of the elbow, what is the evidence? A systematic literature review
    Zwerus, Elisa L.
    Somford, Matthijs P.
    Maissan, Francois
    Heisen, Jelle
    Eygendaal, Denise
    van den Bekerom, Michel P. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 52 (19) : 1253 - +
  • [4] How quickly do breast screeners learn their skills?
    Nevisi, Hossein
    Dong, Leng
    Chen, Yan
    Gale, Alastair G.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2017, 10136
  • [5] An appraisal of the literature on teaching physical examination skills
    Easton, Graham
    Stratford-Martin, James
    Atherton, Helen
    EDUCATION FOR PRIMARY CARE, 2012, 23 (04) : 246 - 254
  • [6] How Do Companies Communicate Sustainability? A Systematic Literature Review
    Borges, Eduardo
    Campos, Susana
    Teixeira, Mario Sergio
    Lucas, Maria Raquel
    Ferreira-Oliveira, Ana Teresa
    Rodrigues, Ana Sofia
    Vaz-Velho, Manuela
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [7] How Do Users Experience Moderation?: A Systematic Literature Review
    Ma, Renkai
    You, Yue
    Gui, Xinning
    Kou, Yubo
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2023, 7 (CSCW2):
  • [8] Physical Examination Education in Graduate Medical Education—A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Somnath Mookherjee
    Lara Pheatt
    Sumant R. Ranji
    Calvin L. Chou
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2013, 28 : 1090 - 1099
  • [9] Physical articular examination in the activity of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature
    Medina, Yimy F.
    Eduardo Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael
    Buitrago-Lopez, Adriana
    Villota, Catalina
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 37 (06) : 1457 - 1464
  • [10] Systematic literature review: Teaching novices programming using robots
    School of Computing and Mathematics, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
    IET Semin Dig, 1 (21-30):