The use of fibrinolytic agents in acute pulmonary embolism (PE), first described over 50 years ago, hastens the resolution of RV stain, leading to earlier hemodynamic improvement. However, this benefit comes at the increased risk of bleeding. The strongest indication for fibrinolysis is in high-risk PE, or that characterized by sus-tained hypotension, while its use in patients with intermediate-risk PE remains con-troversial. Fibrinolysis is generally not recommended for routine use in intermediate -risk PE, although most guidelines advise that it may be considered in patients with signs of acute decompensation and an overall low bleeding risk. The efficacy of fibrinolysis often varies significantly between patients, which may be at least par-tially explained by several factors found to promote resistance to fibrinolysis. Ulti-mately, treatment decisions should carefully weigh the risks and benefits of the individual clinical scenario at hand, including the overall severity, the patient's bleeding risk, and the presence of factors known to promote resistance to fibrinoly-sis. This review aims to further explore the use of fibrinolytic agents in the treatment of PE including specific indications, outcomes, and special considerations.