Spinal High-Velocity Low Amplitude Manipulation in Acute Nonspecific Low Back Pain A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial in Comparison With Diclofenac and Placebo

被引:46
|
作者
von Heymann, Wolfgang J. [1 ]
Schloemer, Patrick [2 ]
Timm, Juergen [2 ]
Muehlbauer, Bernd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bremen, Competence Ctr Clin Studies, D-28203 Bremen, Germany
[2] Univ Bremen, Inst Biometr, D-28203 Bremen, Germany
关键词
acute nonspecific low back pain; spinal HVLA manipulation; randomized controlled trial; diclofenac; placebo-controlled; HEALTH-STATUS; US; COMORBIDITY; PREVALENCE; PATTERNS; CARE; EXPENDITURES; POPULATION; ROLAND; COSTS;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e318275d09c
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel trial with 3 arms. Objective. To investigate in acute nonspecific low back pain (LBP) the effectiveness of spinal high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation compared with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac and with placebo. Summary of Background Data. LBP is an important economical factor in all industrialized countries. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of spinal manipulation in comparison to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or placebo regarding satisfaction and function of the patient, off-work time, and rescue medication. Methods. A total of 101 patients with acute LBP (for <48 hr) were recruited from 5 outpatient practices, exclusion criteria were numerous and strict. The subjects were randomized to 3 groups: (1) spinal manipulation and placebo-diclofenac; (2) sham manipulation and diclofenac; (3) sham manipulation and placebo-diclofenac. Outcomes registered by a second and blinded investigator included self-rated physical disability, function (SF-12), off-work time, and rescue medication between baseline and 12 weeks after randomization. Results. Thirty-seven subjects received spinal manipulation, 38 diclofenac, and 25 no active treatment. The placebo group with a high number of dropouts for unsustainable pain was closed praecox. Comparing the 2 active arms with the placebo group the intervention groups were significantly superior to the control group. Ninety subjects were analyzed in the collective intention to treat. Comparing the 2 intervention groups, the manipulation group was significantly better than the diclofenac group (Mann-Whitney test: P = 0.0134). No adverse effects or harm was registered. Conclusion. In a subgroup of patients with acute nonspecific LBP, spinal manipulation was significantly better than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac and clinically superior to placebo.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 548
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of thiocolchicoside in acute low back pain
    Tüzün, F
    Ünalan, H
    Öner, N
    Özgüzel, H
    Kirazli, Y
    Içagasioglu, A
    Kuran, B
    Tüzün, S
    Basar, G
    JOINT BONE SPINE, 2003, 70 (05) : 356 - 361
  • [2] Comparison of high velocity low amplitude manipulation and dry needle treatment in patients with nonspecific back pain
    Alptekin, Hasan K.
    Ozden, Ali, V
    Alkan, Mirsad
    Oncu Alptekin, Julide
    GAZZETTA MEDICA ITALIANA ARCHIVIO PER LE SCIENZE MEDICHE, 2021, 180 (12) : 815 - 821
  • [3] Electroacupuncture at Traditional Acupoints or Myofascial Trigger Points for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: High or Alternated Frequency? A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ngo, Oanh Thi Kim
    Trinh, Dieu-Thuong Thi
    Tang, Wei
    MEDICAL ACUPUNCTURE, 2024, 36 (05) : 250 - 263
  • [4] Buprenorphine Versus Diclofenac for Pain Relief in Acute Pancreatitis: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
    Saini, Mayank
    Samanta, Jayanta
    Kumar, Antriksh
    Choudhury, Arup
    Dhar, Jahnvi
    Jafra, Anudeep
    Chauhan, Rajeev
    Muktesh, Gaurav
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Gupta, Vikas
    Yadav, Thakur Deen
    Kochhar, Rakesh
    Capurso, Gabriele
    De-Madaria, Enrique
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 22 (03) : 532 - 541
  • [5] Efficacy of Electronic Acupuncture Shoes for Chronic Low Back Pain: Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yeh, Bo-Yan
    Liu, Geng-Hao
    Lee, Tzung-Yan
    Wong, Alice May-Kuen
    Chang, Hen-Hong
    Chen, Yu-Sheng
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (10)
  • [6] Patient-centered outcomes of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation for low back pain: A systematic review
    Goertz, C. M.
    Pohlman, K. A.
    Vining, R. D.
    Brantingham, J. W.
    Long, C. R.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (05) : 670 - 691
  • [7] A comparison of granisetron and nitroglycerine for attenuating rocuronium pain: A double-blinded randomized, placebo controlled trial
    Goyal, Rohit
    Jindal, Parul
    Khurana, Gurjeet
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 8 (01) : 83 - 87
  • [8] Exploring electroencephalographic infraslow neurofeedback treatment for chronic low back pain: a double-blinded safety and feasibility randomized placebo-controlled trial
    Adhia, Divya Bharatkumar
    Mani, Ramakrishnan
    Mathew, Jerin
    O'Leary, Finella
    Smith, Mark
    Vanneste, Sven
    De Ridder, Dirk
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [9] Exploring electroencephalographic infraslow neurofeedback treatment for chronic low back pain: a double-blinded safety and feasibility randomized placebo-controlled trial
    Divya Bharatkumar Adhia
    Ramakrishnan Mani
    Jerin Mathew
    Finella O’Leary
    Mark Smith
    Sven Vanneste
    Dirk De Ridder
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [10] Comparison of diclofenac with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo in the treatment of acute low back pain and sciatica: multi-center randomized controlled trial
    Hung, Kevin K. C.
    Lam, Rex P. K.
    Lee, Herman K. H.
    Choi, Yu Fai
    Tenney, Justin
    Zuo, Zhong
    Chong, Marc K. C.
    Hui, Theresa S., I
    Wong, Tak Kan
    Yiu, Tsz Ying
    Chan, Suet Yi
    Mok, Catherine P. Y.
    Leung, Ling Yan
    Mak, Wai Kit
    Sun, David T. F.
    Cheng, Chi Hung
    Graham, Colin A.
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 100 (1188) : 741 - 750