It is gratifying and enlightening to read these three quite different perspectives on museum practice in Lebanon. This journal will continue to benefit from ever-greater attention to political and social contexts of archaeological work and its cultural by-products, not merely as "popularization" or "outreach" but as essential outcomes of scholarly activity. For while research reports and historical monographs reach at most a few hundred readers, public representations of the past in museums, school textbooks, and "official" national histories-further echoed in the subtle imagery of postage stamps, political speeches, and public commemorations-move millions. They move them to war, peace, xenophobia, or peaceful co-existence. Institutions such as those described in the preceding articles are nothing less than the modern machinery of collective identity.