Gestational Weight Gain-for-Gestational Age Z-Score Charts Applied across US Populations

被引:22
|
作者
Leonard, Stephanie A. [1 ]
Hutcheon, Jennifer A. [2 ]
Bodnar, Lisa M. [3 ,4 ]
Petito, Lucia C. [5 ]
Abrams, Barbara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
weight gain; pregnancy; growth charts; gestational age; premature birth; ethnic groups; BODY-MASS INDEX; SPONTANEOUS PRETERM BIRTH; PREGNANCY; ASSOCIATIONS; CERTIFICATE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/ppe.12435
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundGestational weight gain may be a modifiable contributor to infant health outcomes, but the effect of gestational duration on gestational weight gain has limited the identification of optimal weight gain ranges. Recently developed z-score and percentile charts can be used to classify gestational weight gain independent of gestational duration. However, racial/ethnic variation in gestational weight gain and the possibility that optimal weight gain differs among racial/ethnic groups could affect generalizability of the z-score charts. The objectives of this study were (1) to apply the weight gain z-score charts in two different U.S. populations as an assessment of generalisability and (2) to determine whether race/ethnicity modifies the weight gain range associated with minimal risk of preterm birth. MethodsThe study sample included over 4 million live, singleton births in California (2007-2012) and Pennsylvania (2003-2013). We implemented a noninferiority margin approach in stratified subgroups to determine weight gain ranges for which the adjusted predicted marginal risk of preterm birth (gestation <37weeks) was within 1 or 2 percentage points of the lowest observed risk. ResultsThere were minimal differences in the optimal ranges of gestational weight gain between California and Pennsylvania births, and among several racial/ethnic groups in California. The optimal ranges decreased as severity of prepregnancy obesity increased in all groups. ConclusionsThe findings support the use of weight gain z-score charts for studying gestational age-dependent outcomes in diverse U.S. populations and do not support weight gain recommendations tailored to race/ethnicity.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 171
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Weight gain speed and z-score behavior in large prematures for gestational age
    Scheer, Betania Boeira
    Peres, Andriele Madruga
    Silva, Eduarda de Souza
    Goncalves, Barbara Peter
    Pacheco, Simone Muniz
    Marquez Costa, Maria Veronica
    Valle, Sandra Costa
    NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2022, 39 (06) : 1220 - 1227
  • [2] Behavior of weight z-score in preterm infants who are small for gestational age
    Pegoraro, Giovana Ribeiro
    Scheer, Betania Boeira
    Da Costa, Thielen Borba
    Costa, Maria Veronica Marquez
    Pacheco, Simone Muniz
    Valle, Sandra Costa
    NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2022, 39 (04) : 745 - 751
  • [3] The association between gestational weight gain z-score and stillbirth: a case-control study
    Pickens, Cassandra M.
    Hogue, Carol J.
    Howards, Penelope P.
    Kramer, Michael R.
    Badell, Martina L.
    Dudley, Donald J.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Goldenberg, Robert L.
    Pinar, Halit
    Saade, George R.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Stoll, Barbara J.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [4] The association between gestational weight gain z-score and stillbirth: a case-control study
    Cassandra M. Pickens
    Carol J. Hogue
    Penelope P. Howards
    Michael R. Kramer
    Martina L. Badell
    Donald J. Dudley
    Robert M. Silver
    Robert L. Goldenberg
    Halit Pinar
    George R. Saade
    Michael W. Varner
    Barbara J. Stoll
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19
  • [5] A weight-gain-for-gestational-age z score chart for the assessment of maternal weight gain in pregnancy
    Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
    Platt, Robert W.
    Abrams, Barbara
    Himes, Katherine P.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Bodnar, Lisa M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2013, 97 (05): : 1062 - 1067
  • [6] Gestational weight gain charts for Latin American adolescents
    Restrepo-Mesa, Sandra Lucia
    Rincon, Maria Victoria Benjumea
    Restrepo, Alejandro Estrada
    Carrilho, Thais Rangel Bousquet
    Kac, Gilberto
    Pulgarin, Josue Santiago Cano
    Cano-Pulgarin, Keren
    Severi, Cecilia
    Sinisterra, Odalis
    Sarmiento, Maria del Carmen Zimmer
    Ocampos, Maria Isabel
    Bannout, Marcela Araya
    Chico-Barba, Gabriela
    Arteaga, Nelida Pinto
    Grandi, Carlos
    Samur, Eduardo Atalah
    Escobar, Cristian David Santa
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [7] Genetic risk score for gestational weight gain
    Mikolajczyk-Stecyna, Joanna
    Zuk, Ewelina
    Seremak-Mrozikiewicz, Agnieszka
    Kurzawinska, Grazyna
    Wolski, Hubert
    Drews, Krzysztof
    Chmurzynska, Agata
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 294 : 20 - 27
  • [8] Patterns of Gestational Weight Gain and Infants Born Large-for-Gestational Age Across Consecutive Pregnancies
    Adams, Elizabeth L.
    Marini, Michele E.
    Leonard, Krista S.
    Downs, Danielle Symons
    Paul, Ian M.
    Kraschnewski, Jennifer L.
    Kjerulff, Kristen H.
    Savage, Jennifer S.
    WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2019, 29 (02) : 194 - 200
  • [9] A weight-gain-for-gestational-age z score chart for the assessment of maternal weight gain in pregnancy (vol 97, pg 1062, 2013)
    Hutcheon, J. A.
    Platt, R. W.
    Abrams, B.
    Himes, K. P.
    Simhan, H. N.
    Bodnar, L. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2014, 100 (01): : 300 - 300
  • [10] Weight Gain for Gestational-Age Charts in Dichorionic Twins: Tool for Establishing Optimal Weight Gain in Twin Pregnancies
    Widen, Elizabeth M.
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (02) : 181 - 183