FLORA™: Phase I development of a functional vision assessment for prosthetic vision users

被引:38
|
作者
Geruschat, Duane R. [1 ]
Flax, Marshall [2 ]
Tanna, Nilima
Bianchi, Michelle [3 ]
Fisher, Andy [4 ]
Goldschmidt, Mira
Fisher, Lynne [4 ]
Dagnelie, Gislin [1 ]
Deremeik, Jim [1 ]
Smith, Audrey [5 ]
Anaflous, Fatima
Dorn, Jessy [6 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Wilmer Eye Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Wisconsin Council Blind & Visually Impaired, Madison, WI USA
[3] Greater Baltimore Med Ctr, Hoover Low Vis Rehabil Serv, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Focal Point, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Salus Univ, Coll Educ & Rehabil, Elkins Pk, PA USA
[6] Second Sight Med Prod, Sylmar, CA USA
关键词
activities of daily living; functional vision; orientation and mobility; prosthetic vision; quality of life; retinal prosthesis; MOBILITY PERFORMANCE; OLDER-ADULTS; REHABILITATION; ORIENTATION; OUTCOMES; LIFE;
D O I
10.1111/cxo.12242
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: Research groups and funding agencies need a functional assessment suitable for an ultra-low vision population to evaluate the impact of new vision-restoration treatments. The purpose of this study was to develop a pilot assessment to capture the functional visual ability and well-being of subjects whose vision has been partially restored with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System. Methods: The Functional Low-Vision Observer Rated Assessment (FLORA) pilot assessment involved a self-report section, a list of functional visual tasks for observation of performance and a case narrative summary. Results were analysed to determine whether the interview questions and functional visual tasks were appropriate for this ultra-low vision population and whether the ratings suffered from floor or ceiling effects. Thirty subjects with severe to profound retinitis pigmentosa (bare light perception or worse in both eyes) were enrolled in a clinical trial and implanted with the Argus II System. From this population, 26 subjects were assessed with the FLORA. Seven different evaluators administered the assessment. Results: All 14 interview questions were asked. All 35 tasks for functional vision were selected for evaluation at least once, with an average of 20 subjects being evaluated for each test item. All four rating options-impossible (33 per cent), difficult (23 per cent), moderate (24 per cent) and easy (19 per cent)-were used by the evaluators. Evaluators also judged the amount of vision they observed the subjects using to complete the various tasks, with 'vision only' occurring 75 per cent on average with the System ON, and 29 per cent with the System OFF. Conclusion: The first version of the FLORA was found to contain useful elements for evaluation and to avoid floor and ceiling effects. The next phase of development will be to refine the assessment and to establish reliability and validity to increase its value as an assessment tool for functional vision and well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 347
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a questionnaire for assessment of functional vision in low vision children
    Gothwal, VK
    Lovie-Kitchin, J
    Nutheti, R
    Rao, GN
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2002, 43 : U191 - U191
  • [2] Functional Assessment of Vision Restoration
    McGregor, Juliette E.
    Williams, David R.
    Merigan, William H.
    RETINAL DEGENERATIVE DISEASES: MECHANISMS AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY, 2019, 1185 : 145 - 149
  • [3] Development of Immersive Virtual Reality Environment for Assessment of Functional Vision in people with Low Vision: A Pilot Study
    Gopalakrishnan, Sarika
    Jacob, Chris Elsa Samson
    Kumar, Meenakshi
    Karunakaran, Vijay
    Raman, Rajiv
    NEPALESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [4] Development of a vision impairment score for the assessment of functional vision in dogs: Initial evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness
    Graham, Kathleen L.
    Reid, Jacky
    Whittaker, Cameron J. G.
    Hall, Evelyn J. S.
    Caruso, Kelly
    McCowan, Christina I.
    White, Andrew
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 22 (06) : 807 - 818
  • [5] Assessment of functional vision and its rehabilitation
    Colenbrander, August
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2010, 88 (02) : 163 - 173
  • [6] The Assessment of Visual Function and Functional Vision
    Bennett, Christopher R.
    Bex, Peter J.
    Bauer, Corinna M.
    Merabet, Lotfi B.
    SEMINARS IN PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2019, 31 : 30 - 40
  • [7] Simulating prosthetic vision: II. Measuring functional capacity
    Chen, Spencer C.
    Suaning, Gregg J.
    Morley, John W.
    Lovell, Nigel H.
    VISION RESEARCH, 2009, 49 (19) : 2329 - 2343
  • [8] Simulating prosthetic vision: I. Visual models of phosphenes
    Chen, Spencer C.
    Suaning, Gregg J.
    Morley, John W.
    Lovell, Nigel H.
    VISION RESEARCH, 2009, 49 (12) : 1493 - 1506
  • [9] A vision for the development of i-campus
    Kwok L.-F.
    Smart Learning Environments, 2 (1)
  • [10] DEVELOPMENT OF A QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF VISION FUNCTION
    MANGIONE, CM
    LEE, P
    BERRY, SH
    HAYS, RD
    JANZ, NK
    KLEIN, R
    OWSLEY, C
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1995, 36 (04) : S428 - S428