Methodological issues in evaluating complex healthcare interventions

被引:76
|
作者
Blackwood, Bronagh [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Belfast BT9 5AF, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
clinical nurse specialists; community nurses; complex nursing interventions; evaluation research; intensive care; mechanical ventilation; methodology; weaning protocols;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03869.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim. This paper outlines the difficulties in defining and evaluating a complex intervention and a number of currently available models for assisting this process are discussed. Backround. Interventions aimed at producing change in the delivery and organization of healthcare services require rigorous evaluation to demonstrate their effectiveness. Evaluation poses difficulties, however, because these interventions are usually very complex. Methods. A framework developed by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council to evaluate complex interventions is described. The use of this framework in designing and evaluating a nurse-led intervention in intensive care for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation is discussed. Semi-structured interviews, a questionnaire survey and observational work were undertaken to define the components of the intervention, which was subsequently evaluated in an exploratory trial using a quasi-experimental design. Conclusion. The framework was a useful tool and can be easily applied in developing and evaluating complex nursing interventions. Three key challenges emerge from this experience: (i) relevant research evidence should be used systematically in developing the components of the intervention, (ii) the definition and measurement of complex intervention outcomes needs to be improved and (iii) appropriate research designs must be used when evaluating complex interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 622
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research methodological issues in evaluating herbal interventions
    Bansal, Dipika
    Hota, Debasish
    Chakrabarti, Amitava
    OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL OF CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 2 : 15 - 21
  • [2] Important Methodological Issues in Evaluating Community-Based Interventions
    Parker, Richard
    Bush, Jack
    Harris, Daryl
    EVALUATION REVIEW, 2014, 38 (04) : 295 - 308
  • [3] Methodological issues in pragmatic trials of complex interventions in primary care
    Foster, Nadine
    Little, Paul
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (594): : 10 - 11
  • [4] Evaluating complex interventions: Perspectives and issues for health behaviour change interventions
    Tarquinio, Cyril
    Kivits, Joelle
    Minary, Laetitia
    Coste, Joel
    Alla, Francois
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2015, 30 (01) : 35 - 51
  • [5] RESEARCH WORKSHOP ON METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN EVALUATING PREVENTIVE INTERVENTIONS USING MUTUAL SUPPORT
    GOLDKLANG, DS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) : 789 - 795
  • [6] Research design issues for evaluating complex multicomponent interventions in neighborhoods and communities
    Komro, Kelli A.
    Flay, Brian R.
    Biglan, Anthony
    Wagenaar, Alexander C.
    TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 6 (01) : 153 - 159
  • [7] Methodological Considerations in Evaluating eHealth Interventions
    Nguyen, Huong Q.
    Cuenco, DorAnne
    Wolpin, Seth
    Benditt, Josh
    Carrieri-Kohlman, Virginia
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2007, 39 (01) : 117 - 134
  • [8] Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews
    Song, Fujian
    Loke, Yoon K.
    Walsh, Tanya
    Glenny, Anne-Marie
    Eastwood, Alison J.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 : 932 - 935
  • [9] ON EVALUATING PATIENT SATISFACTION - METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES
    ELGUEBALY, N
    TOEWS, J
    LECKIE, A
    HARPER, D
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 1983, 28 (01): : 24 - 29
  • [10] Evaluating complex interventions
    Seers, Kate
    WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2007, 4 (02) : 67 - 68