Application of QSARs and VFARs to the rapid risk assessment process at US EPA

被引:5
|
作者
Moudgal, C. J. [1 ]
Young, D. [2 ]
Nichols, T. [3 ]
Martin, T. [2 ]
Harten, P. [2 ]
Venkatapathy, R.
Stelma, G. [4 ]
Siddhanti, S. [5 ]
Baier-Anderson, C. [5 ]
Wolfe, M. [6 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, TCAD, NHSRC, ENSV IO, Kansas City, KS 66101 USA
[2] US EPA, Clean Proc Branch, NRMRL, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[3] US EPA, TCAD, NHSRC, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[4] US EPA, Microbiol & Chem Exposure Assessment Res Div, NERL, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[5] Endyna Inc, Mclean, VA USA
[6] SAIC, Reston, VA USA
关键词
QSAR; VFAR; risk assessment; NHSRC; NRMRL;
D O I
10.1080/10629360802348944
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
With continued development of new chemicals and genetically engineered microbes as potential agents for terrorism and industrial development, there is a great need for the continued development and application of quantitative structure activity relationships (QSARs) and virulence factor activity relationships (VFARs). Development and application of QSARs and VFARs will facilitate efficient and streamlined use of dwindling resources and assessment of risks associated with exposures to chemical and biological agents. To facilitate the continued development of QSARs and VFARs at US Environmental Protection Agency, a two day workshop was organized June 20-21, 2006, in Cincinnati, OH, USA. This article summarizes the workshop report by highlighting the importance of continued QSAR research, the current state of VFAR science, and the guidance provided to the National Homeland Security Research Center and National Risk Management Research Laboratory by an expert panel for the continued use and development of computational approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 587
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Protecting Native Americans Through the Risk Assessment Process: A Commentary on "An Examination of US EPA Risk Assessment Principles and Practices"
    Bridgen, Pamela
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 1 (01) : 83 - 85
  • [2] QSARs in ecotoxicological risk assessment
    De Roode, Daphne
    Hoekzema, Conny
    de Vries-Buitenweg, Selinda
    van de Waart, Beppy
    van der Hoeven, Jan
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 45 (01) : 24 - 35
  • [3] A cancer risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate: Application of the new US EPA risk assessment guidelines
    Doull, J
    Cattley, R
    Elcombe, C
    Lake, BG
    Swenberg, J
    Wilkinson, C
    Williams, G
    van Gemert, M
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 29 (03) : 327 - 357
  • [4] The US EPA workshop on research and risk assessment for arsenic
    Thomas, David J.
    Hudgens, Edward E.
    Calderon, Rebecca L.
    TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 222 (03) : 243 - 244
  • [5] EPA'S RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS NEEDS AN UPGRADE
    不详
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2008, 86 (49) : 26 - 26
  • [6] Pesticide residues and acute risk assessment - the US EPA approach
    Suhre, FB
    FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS, 2000, 17 (07): : 569 - 573
  • [7] US EPA's approach to risk assessment and regulation of biopesticides
    Tomimatsu, G.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 99 (06) : S175 - S175
  • [8] Scientific Issues in the US EPA Framework for Metals Risk Assessment
    Bradham, Karen
    Wentsel, Randall
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES, 2010, 73 (2-3): : 108 - 113
  • [9] What if there was no USDA Pesticide Data Program? Advantages and rigor of the US EPA tiered process for risk assessment
    Cleveland, Cheryl B.
    Fleming, Carrie R.
    Stewart, Jane
    Haynes, Diana
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 246