Process industry energy retrofits:: the importance of emission baselines for greenhouse gas reductions

被引:6
|
作者
Ådahl, A [1 ]
Harvey, S [1 ]
Berntsson, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Sci, Heat & Power Technol Grp, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
greenhouse gas reduction; emission baselines; process integration;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00103-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Fuel combustion for heat and/or electric power production is often the largest contributor of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from an industrial process plant. Economically feasible options to reduce these emissions include fuel switching and retrofitting the plant's energy system. Process integration methods and tools can be used to evaluate potential retrofit measures. For assessing the GHG emissions reduction potential for the measures considered, it is also necessary to define appropriate GHG emission baselines. This paper presents a systematic GHG emission calculation method for retrofit situations including improved heat exchange, integration of combined heat and power (CHP) units, and combinations of both. The proposed method is applied to five different industrial processes in order to compare the impact of process specific parameters and energy market specific parameters. For potential GHG emission reductions the results from the applied study reveal that electricity grid emissions are significantly more important than differences between individual processes. Based on the results of the study, it is suggested that for sustainable investment decision considerations a conservative emission baseline is most appropriate. Even so, new industrial CHP in the Northern European energy market could play a significant role in the common effort to decrease GHG emissions. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1375 / 1388
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of Genetic Programming Classification in an Industrial Process Resulting in Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions
    Lotz, Marco
    Silva, Sara
    APPLICATIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, PT II, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 6025 : 131 - 140
  • [2] ASSESSMENT OF WASTE WOOD POTENTIAL FOR THE ENERGY PRODUCTION AND THE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION REDUCTIONS IN SWITZERLAND
    Bergeron, Francis C.
    PAPERS OF THE 22ND EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2014, : 228 - 231
  • [3] Application of the API compendium of greenhouse gas emissions estimation methodologies for the oil and gas industry to examine potential emission reductions
    Ritter, K
    Nordrum, S
    Shires, T
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 1025 - 1030
  • [4] Long-term energy savings and greenhouse gas emission reductions in the Swiss residential sector
    Siller, Thomas
    Kost, Michael
    Imboden, Dieter
    ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (01) : 529 - 539
  • [5] Costs and benefits of differences in the timing of greenhouse gas emission reductions
    Annemiek K. Admiraal
    Andries F. Hof
    Michel G. J. den Elzen
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2016, 21 : 1165 - 1179
  • [6] Costs and benefits of differences in the timing of greenhouse gas emission reductions
    Admiraal, Annemiek K.
    Hof, Andries F.
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2016, 21 (08) : 1165 - 1179
  • [7] A Sensitivity Analysis of Timing and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions
    Reyer Gerlagh
    Bob van der Zwaan
    Climatic Change, 2004, 65 : 39 - 71
  • [8] A sensitivity analysis of timing and costs of greenhouse gas emission reductions
    Gerlagh, R
    Van der Zwaan, B
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2004, 65 (1-2) : 39 - 71
  • [9] Future energy goals for Maryland: Greenhouse gas reductions
    Switzer S.
    Electricity Journal, 2021, 34 (03):
  • [10] The importance of economies of scale for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from shipping
    Lindstad, Haakon
    Asbjornslett, Bjorn E.
    Stromman, Anders H.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 46 : 386 - 398