Community-Based Participatory Research to Adapt Health Measures for Use by People With Developmental Disabilities

被引:44
|
作者
Nicolaidis, Christina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Raymaker, Dora
Katz, Marsha [4 ]
Oschwald, Mary [1 ]
Goe, Rebecca [4 ]
Leotti, Sandra [1 ]
Grantham, Leah [4 ]
Plourde, Eddie
Salomon, Janice
Hughes, Rosemary B. [4 ]
Powers, Laurie E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Sch Social Work, Reg Res Inst Human Serv, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] Univ Montana, Rural Inst, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
关键词
Community-based participatory research; process issues; health care surveys; health services research; disabled persons; measurement adaptation; developmental disabilities; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; ASSISTED SELF-INTERVIEW; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; OLDER-ADULTS; DEPRESSION; VALIDITY; VIOLENCE; SCALE; PARTNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1353/cpr.2015.0037
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: People with developmental disabilities (DD) are often not included as participants in research owing to a variety of ethical and practical challenges. One major challenge is that traditional measurement instruments may not be accessible to people with DD. Participatory research approaches promise to increase the participation of marginalized communities in research, but few partnerships have successfully used such approaches to conduct quantitative studies people with DD. Objective: To use a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to create an accessible, computer-assisted survey about violence and health in people with DD, and to psychometrically test adapted health instruments. Methods: Our academic community partnership, composed of academic researchers, people with DD, and supporters, collaboratively selected and modified data collection instruments, conducted cognitive interviews and pilot tests, and then administered the full survey to 350 people with DD. Results: Although team members sometimes had opposing accommodation needs and adaptation recommendations, academic and community partners were able to work together successfully to adapt instruments to be accessible to participants with a wide range of DD. Results suggest the adapted health instruments had strong content validity and all but one had good to excellent internal consistency reliability (alpha, 0.81-0.94). The majority of participants (75%) responded that all or most of the questions were easy to understand. Conclusions: Researchers should consider using participatory approaches to adapting instruments so people with DD can be validly included in research.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 170
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条