共 3 条
Early intensive hand rehabilitation is not more effective than usual care plus one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute spinal cord injury ('Hands On'): a randomised trial
被引:16
|作者:
Harvey, Lisa A.
[1
,2
]
Dunlop, Sarah A.
[3
]
Churilov, Leonid
[4
,5
]
Galea, Mary P.
[6
]
机构:
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Med, John Walsh Ctr Rehabil Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Royal North Shore Hosp, Kolling Inst, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Biol Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Florey Neurosci Inst, Natl Stroke Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Math & Stat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词:
Spinal cord injury;
Hand therapy;
Rehabilitation;
Physical therapy;
Randomised controlled trial;
UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION;
INDEPENDENCE MEASURE;
MASSED PRACTICE;
STIMULATION;
TETRAPLEGIA;
PLASTICITY;
RELIABILITY;
VALIDITY;
SCALE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jphys.2017.08.005
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Question: What is the effect of adding an intensive task-specific hand-training program involving functional electrical stimulation to a combination of usual care plus three 15-minute sessions per week of one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute tetraplegia? Design: A parallel group, randomised, controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned (1: 1) via a computer-generated concealed block randomisation procedure to either a control or experimental intervention. Participants: Seventy people with C2 to T1 motor complete or incomplete tetraplegia within 6 months of injury. Participants were recruited from seven spinal units in Australia and New Zealand. Intervention: Experimental participants received intensive training for one hand. Intensive training consisted of training with an instrumented exercise workstation in conjunction with functional electrical stimulation for 1 hour per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Both groups received usual care and 15 minutes of one-to-one hand therapy three times per week without functional electrical stimulation. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the modified Action Research Arm Test reflecting arm and hand function, which was assessed at the end of the intervention, that is, 11 weeks after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were measured at 11 and 26 weeks. Results: Sixty-six (94%) participants completed the post-intervention assessment and were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. The mean (SD) modified Action Research Arm Test score for experimental and control participants at the post-intervention assessment was 36.5 points (SD 16.0) and 33.2 points (SD 17.5), respectively, with an adjusted mean between-group difference of 0.9 points (95% CI -4.1 to 5.9). Conclusion: Adding an intensive task-specific hand-training program involving functional electrical stimulation to a combination of usual care plus three 15-minute sessions per week of one-to-one hand therapy does not improve hand function in people with sub-acute tetraplegia. (C) 2017 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 204
页数:8
相关论文