Corporate social performance feedback and corporate social responsibility decoupling in China: The salience of legitimacy and/or efficiency

被引:2
|
作者
Xue, Shan [1 ]
Xu, Yuehua [2 ,4 ]
Chen, Honghui [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Sch Management, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Business, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Univ, Sch Management, 27 Shandanan, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
关键词
behavioral theory of social performance; CSR decoupling; issue salience; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; EARNINGS PRESSURE; CSR; INDUSTRY; ORGANIZATIONS; SPECIFICATION; EXPECTATIONS; STAKEHOLDERS; GOVERNANCE; REPUTATION;
D O I
10.1002/csr.2738
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite its detrimental effects, corporate social responsibility (CSR) decoupling has been underexamined in the literature. This research explores why and how companies engage in CSR decoupling from the perspective of behavioral theory of social performance. We contend that legitimacy threats drive firms with corporate social performance (CSP) below stakeholder expectations toward substantive CSR initiatives, which reduces CSR decoupling. In contrast, efficiency deficit drives firms with CSP above stakeholder expectations toward symbolic CSR initiatives, increasing CSR decoupling. Building upon literature on issue salience, these relationships are moderated by industry culpability and earnings pressure. A longitudinal analysis was conducted on Heckman two-stage estimation using a sample of 5166 Chinese publicly listed firms from 2010 to 2019, which supports our hypotheses. Additionally, the findings remain robust after rigorous tests. This study contributes to the CSR literature by shedding light on the impact of CSP feedback on CSR decoupling and enriches the behavioral theory of social performance by incorporating the perspective on CSP feedback through issue salience.
引用
收藏
页码:3164 / 3180
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Feedback on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance
    Lee, Jae-Eun
    Yang, Young Soo
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [2] Governing Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling: The Effect of the Governance Committee on Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling
    Ammar Ali Gull
    Nazim Hussain
    Sana Akbar Khan
    Zaheer Khan
    Asif Saeed
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, 185 : 349 - 374
  • [3] Governing Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling: The Effect of the Governance Committee on Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling
    Gull, Ammar Ali
    Hussain, Nazim
    Khan, Sana Akbar
    Khan, Zaheer
    Saeed, Asif
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2023, 185 (02) : 349 - 374
  • [4] The Nature and Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility
    Hu Zhiguang
    Xu Jiabin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH EURO-ASIA CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND CSR: TOURISM, MICE, HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION SESSION, PT I, 2012, : 202 - 207
  • [5] CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
    Hedva, Vinarski-Peretz
    GLOBAL AND NATIONAL BUSINESS THEORIES AND PRACTICE: BRIDGING THE PAST WITH THE FUTURE, 2017, : 2400 - 2402
  • [6] Corporate social responsibility and corporate innovation efficiency: evidence from China
    Yuan, Ling
    Zheng, Li
    Xu, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2023, 18 (12) : 6125 - 6142
  • [7] Corporate social responsibility, social identity, and innovation performance in China
    Ko, Kuan-Cheng
    Nie, Jun
    Ran, Rong
    Gu, Yuan
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2020, 63
  • [8] Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance
    Huang, Chi-Jui
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION, 2010, 16 (05) : 641 - 655
  • [9] Criteria for Evaluating the Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility
    Moses L. Pava
    Joshua Krausz
    Journal of Business Ethics, 1997, 16 : 337 - 347
  • [10] CORPORATE LEGITIMACY AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - ROLE OF LAW
    SCHLUSBERG, MD
    CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1969, 12 (01) : 65 - 76