An artificial intelligence algorithmic approach to ethical decision-making in human resource management processes

被引:108
作者
Rodgers, Waymond [1 ,2 ]
Murray, James M. [3 ]
Stefanidis, Abraham [4 ]
Degbey, William Y. [5 ,6 ]
Tarba, Shlomo Y. [7 ]
机构
[1] Hull Univ, Business Sch, Kingston Upon Hull, England
[2] Univ Texas El Paso, El Paso, TX USA
[3] Univ Hull, Business Sch, Kingston Upon Hull, England
[4] St Johns Univ, Peter J Tobin Coll Business, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Vaasa, Sch Management, Vaasa, Finland
[6] Univ Turku, Turku Sch Econ, Turku, Finland
[7] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Business Sch, Birmingham, England
关键词
Throughput model; Ethics; Perception; Judgment; Artificial intelligence; INVOLVEMENT; PATHWAYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100925
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Management scholars and practitioners have highlighted the importance of ethical dimensions in the selection of strategies. However, to date, there has been little effort aimed at theoretically understanding the ethical positions of individuals/organizations concerning human resource management (HRM) decision-making processes, the selection of specific ethical positions and strategies, or the post-decision accounting for those decisions. To this end, we present a Throughput model framework that describes individuals' decision-making processes in an algo-rithmic HRM context. The model depicts how perceptions, judgments, and the use of information affect strategy selection, identifying how diverse strategies may be supported by the employment of certain ethical decision-making algorithmic pathways. In focusing on concerns relating to the impact and acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) integration in HRM, this research draws in-sights from multidisciplinary theoretical lenses, such as AI-augmented (HRM(AI)) and HRM(AI) assimilation processes, AI-mediated social exchange, and the judgment and choice literature. We highlight the use of algorithmic ethical positions in the adoption of AI for better HRM outcomes in terms of intelligibility and accountability of AI-generated HRM decision-making, which is often underexplored in existing research, and we propose their key role in HRM strategy selection.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Algorithmic decision-making? The user interface and its role for human involvement in decisions supported by artificial intelligence [J].
Bader, Verena ;
Kaiser, Stephan .
ORGANIZATION, 2019, 26 (05) :655-672
[2]   When AI meets PC: exploring the implications of workplace social robots and a human-robot psychological contract [J].
Bankins, Sarah ;
Formosa, Paul .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 29 (02) :215-229
[3]   A Ticket for Your Thoughts: Method for Predicting Content Recall and Sales Using Neural Similarity of Moviegoers [J].
Barnett, Samuel B. ;
Cerf, Moran .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2017, 44 (01) :160-181
[4]  
Barro S, 2019, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V60, P22
[5]  
2019, Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, V7, P25, DOI [10.22381/pihrm7220194, 10.22381/pihrm7120194, 10.22381/pihrm7120194, DOI 10.22381/PIHRM7120194, 10.22381/PIHRM7220194, DOI 10.22381/PIHRM7220194]
[6]  
Bentham Jeremy., 1962, The Works of Jeremy Bentham
[7]  
Bolstad WilliamM., 2016, Introduction to Bayesian statistics
[8]  
Buzko I., 2016, Computer Modelling and New Technologies, V20, P26
[9]   Can HR adapt to the paradoxes of artificial intelligence? [J].
Charlwood, Andy ;
Guenole, Nigel .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 32 (04) :729-742
[10]   Big Data Opportunities for Accounting and Finance Practice and Research [J].
Cockcroft, Sophie ;
Russell, Mark .
AUSTRALIAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2018, 28 (03) :323-333