Determining the laser absorptivity of Ti-6Al-4V during laser powder bed fusion by calibrated melt pool simulation

被引:32
|
作者
Cook, Peter S. [1 ]
Ritchie, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Mfg, Private Bag 10, Clayton, Vic 3169, Australia
来源
关键词
Additive manufacturing (AM) process; Multiphysics model; Ti-6Al-4V laser absorptivity; Laser powder bed fusion; Simulation; THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES; HEAT-TRANSFER; FLUID-FLOW; TEMPERATURE; EMISSIVITY; ALLOY; BEAM; MICROSTRUCTURE; 90TI-6AL-4V; BENCHMARK;
D O I
10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109247
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing processes such as laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) are now routinely used for advanced medical and aerospace components. However, moving from these bespoke applications to high-volume com-mercial manufacturing requires higher levels of predictability and control of part properties. Detailed simulations of the LPBF process can assist this transition by providing understanding of defect mechanisms and guiding paths to improvement. An accurate value of laser absorptivity for the material is critical for LPBF simulation but the published literature contains surprisingly little absorptivity data applicable to actual LPBF operating conditions. Here we determine the in-situ laser absorptivity of the alloy Ti-6Al-4V during LPBF to be 0.27 +/-0.03, for a laser wavelength of 1.07 mu m. Our technique involves calibrating melt pool CFD simulations against single-track experiments conducted over a range of energy densities and can be extended to other materials. The simulations incorporate multiple laser reflections and cover the transition from conduction to keyhole mode. We also discuss physical mechanisms that may be responsible for changes in the absorption behaviour at high laser energy density which are observed in this and other work.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Melt Pool Analysis and Mesoscale Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process (L-PBF) with Ti-6Al-4V Powder Particles
    Rauniyar, Santosh K.
    Chou, Kevin
    JOM, 2019, 71 (03) : 938 - 945
  • [2] Numerical Simulation in the Melt Pool Evolution of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process for Ti6Al4V
    Xu, Yixuan
    Zhang, Dongyun
    Deng, Junyuan
    Wu, Xuping
    Li, Lingshan
    Xie, Yinkai
    Poprawe, Reinhart
    Schleifenbaum, Johannes Henrich
    Ziegler, Stephan
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (21)
  • [3] Melt Pool Analysis and Mesoscale Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process (L-PBF) with Ti-6Al-4V Powder Particles
    Santosh K. Rauniyar
    Kevin Chou
    JOM, 2019, 71 : 938 - 945
  • [4] The Effect of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process on Ti-6Al-4V Powder
    Memu, Firat
    Durlu, Nuri
    Yagmur, Aydin
    JOM, 2025,
  • [5] Process variation in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti-6Al-4V
    Chen, Zhuoer
    Wu, Xinhua
    Davies, Chris H. J.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2021, 41
  • [6] Precipitation hardening of laser powder bed fusion Ti-6Al-4V
    Derimow, Nicholas
    Benzing, Jake T.
    Garcia, Jacob
    Levin, Zachary S.
    Lu, Ping
    Moser, Newell
    Beamer, Chad
    Delrio, Frank W.
    Hrabe, Nik
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2025, 921
  • [7] Thermal Conductivity of Ti-6Al-4V in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Bartsch, Katharina
    Bossen, Bastian
    Chaudhary, Waqar
    Landry, Michael
    Herzog, Dirk
    FRONTIERS IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING-SWITZERLAND, 2022, 8
  • [8] The Effect of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process on Ti-6Al-4V PowderThe Effect of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process on Ti-6Al-4V PowderMemu, Durlu, and Yagmur
    Firat Memu
    Nuri Durlu
    Aydin Yagmur
    JOM, 2025, 77 (5) : 3906 - 3917
  • [9] Numerical simulation of melt pool size and flow evolution for laser powder bed fusion of powder grade Ti6Al4V
    Chen, Dongju
    Li, Gang
    Wang, Peng
    Zeng, Zhiqiang
    Tang, Yuhang
    FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2023, 223
  • [10] Temperature profile and melt depth in laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy
    Criales L.E.
    Özel T.
    Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2017, 2 (3) : 169 - 177