Evaluating the impact on health outcomes of an event that resulted in a delay in contact tracing of COVID-19 cases in England, September 2020: an observational study

被引:0
|
作者
Findlater, Lucy [1 ]
Pierotti, Livia [2 ]
Turner, Charlie [3 ]
Wensley, Adrian [4 ]
Chen, Cong [3 ]
Seaman, Shaun [5 ]
Samartsidis, Pantelis [5 ]
Charlett, Andre [6 ]
Anderson, Charlotte [6 ]
Hughes, Gareth [4 ]
Hickman, Matthew [2 ]
Edeghere, Obaghe [7 ]
Oliver, Isabel [1 ]
机构
[1] UK Hlth Secur Agcy South England, Bristol, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, England
[3] UK Hlth Secur Agcy East England, Cambridge, England
[4] UK Hlth Secur Agcy North England, Leeds, England
[5] MRC Biostat Unit, Cambridge, England
[6] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, London, England
[7] UK Hlth Secur Agcy Midlands & East England, Birmingham, Warwickshire, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
COVID-19; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INFECTIOUS DISEASES; PUBLIC HEALTH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064982
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveIn September 2020, 15 861 SARS-CoV-2 case records failed to upload from the Second Generation Surveillance System (SGSS) to the Contact Tracing Advisory Service (CTAS) tool, delaying the contact tracing of these cases. This study used CTAS data to determine the impact of this delay on population health outcomes: transmission events, hospitalisations and mortality. Previously, a modelling study suggested a substantial impact.DesignObservational study.SettingEngland.PopulationIndividuals testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and their reported contacts.Main outcome measuresSecondary attack rates (SARs), hospitalisations and deaths among primary and secondary contacts were calculated, compared with all other concurrent, unaffected cases. Affected SGSS records were matched to CTAS records. Successive contacts and cases were identified and matched to hospital episode and mortality outcomes.ResultsInitiation of contact tracing was delayed by 3 days on average in the primary cases in the delay group (6 days) compared with the control group (3 days). This was associated with lower completion of contact tracing: 80% (95% CI: 79% to 81%) in delay group and 83% (95% CI: 83% to 84%) in control group. There was some evidence to suggest increased transmission to non-household contacts among those affected by the delay. The SAR for non-household contacts was higher among secondary contacts in the delay group than the control group (delay group: 7.9%, 95% CI: 6.5% to 9.2%; control group: 5.9%, 95% CI: 5.3% to 6.6%). There did not appear to be a significant difference between the delay and control groups in the odds of hospitalisation (crude OR: 1.1 (95% CI: 0.9 to 1.2)) or death (crude OR: 0.7 (95% CI: 0.1 to 4.0)) among secondary contacts.ConclusionsOur analysis suggests that the delay in contact tracing had a limited impact on population health outcomes; however, contact tracing was not completed for all individuals, so some transmission events might not be captured.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigation and contact tracing of the first cases of COVID-19 in Mozambique, 2020
    Braga, Judite Monteiro
    Banze, Auria Ribeiro
    Dengo-Baloi, Liliana
    Evaristo, Virginia Lara
    Rossetto, Erika Valeska
    Baltazar, Cynthia Sema
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 41
  • [2] COVID-19 Contact Tracing Outcomes in Washington State, August and October 2020
    Bonacci, Robert A.
    Manahan, Lillian M.
    Miller, James S.
    Moonan, Patrick K.
    Lipparelli, Missy B.
    DiFedele, Lisa M.
    Davis, Lora B.
    Lash, R. Ryan
    Oeltmann, John E.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [3] COVID-19 Contact Tracing as an Indicator for Evaluating a Pandemic Situation: Simulation Study
    Marques-Cruz, Manuel
    Nogueira-Leite, Diogo
    Alves, Joao Miguel
    Fernandes, Francisco
    Fernandes, Jose Miguel
    Almeida, Miguel Angelo
    Correia, Patricia Cunha
    Perestrelo, Paula
    Cruz-Correia, Ricardo
    Barros, Pedro Pita
    JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2023, 9
  • [4] Key performance indicators of COVID-19 contact tracing in Belgium from September 2020 to December 2021
    Kremer, Cecile
    Willem, Lander
    Boone, Jorden
    de Onate, Wouter Arrazola
    Hammami, Naima
    Faes, Christel
    Hens, Niel
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (10):
  • [5] Impact of COVID-19 contact tracing on human resources for health - A Caribbean perspective
    Sobers, N. P.
    Howitt, C. H.
    Jeyaseelan, S. M.
    Greaves, N. S.
    Harewood, H.
    Murphy, M. M.
    Quimby, K.
    Hambleton, I. R.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2021, 22
  • [6] The impact of contact tracing and testing on controlling COVID-19 outbreak without lockdown in Hong Kong: An observational study
    Yuan, Hsiang-Yu
    Blakemore, Colin
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2022, 20
  • [7] The impact of contact tracing and testing on controlling COVID-19 outbreak without lockdown in Hong Kong: An observational study
    Yuan, Hsiang-Yu
    Blakemore, Colin
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2022, 20
  • [8] Impact of COVID-19 vaccination on COVID-19 hospital admissions in England during 2021: an observational study
    Cornforth, Felicity
    Webber, Lucie
    Kerr, Gabriele
    Dinsdale, Hywell
    Majeed, Azeem
    Greengross, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2023, 116 (05) : 167 - 176
  • [9] COVID-19 in Punjab, India: Epidemiological patterns, laboratory surveillance and contact tracing of COVID-19 cases, March-May 2020
    Sharma, Sahil
    Goel, Kapil
    Kurup, Karishma Krishna
    Grover, Gagandeep Singh
    Bhaskar, Rajesh
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 11
  • [10] Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study
    Kretzschmar, Mirjam E.
    Rozhnova, Ganna
    Bootsma, Martin C. J.
    van Boven, Michiel
    van de Wijgert, Janneke H. H. M.
    Bonten, Marc J. M.
    LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 5 (08): : E452 - E459