Slurring expressions display puzzling behaviour when embedded, such as under negation and in attitude and speech reports. They frequently appear to retain their characteristic qualities, like offensiveness and propensity to derogate. Yet it is sometimes possible to understand them as lacking these qualities. A theory of slurring expressions should explain this variability. We develop an explanation that deploys the linguistic notion of focus. Our proposal is that a speaker can conversationally implicate metalinguistic claims about the aptness of a focused slurring expression. This explanation of variability relies on independently motivated mechanisms and is compatible with any theory of slurring expressions.
机构:
Univ Penn, Dept Linguist, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Univ Penn, Dept Philosophy, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Univ Penn, Inst Res Cognit Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USAUniv Penn, Dept Linguist, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
机构:
Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Fac Philosophy, Milan, Italy
Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Fac Philosophy, Ctr Direz Milano 2, I-20054 Segrate, MI, ItalyUniv Vita Salute San Raffaele, Fac Philosophy, Milan, Italy
Cepollaro, Bianca
Sulpizio, Simone
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Milan, ItalyUniv Vita Salute San Raffaele, Fac Philosophy, Milan, Italy
Sulpizio, Simone
Bianchi, Claudia
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Fac Philosophy, Milan, ItalyUniv Vita Salute San Raffaele, Fac Philosophy, Milan, Italy
Bianchi, Claudia
Stojanovic, Isidora
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
CNRS, Inst Jean Nicod, PSL, DEC,ENS, Paris, FranceUniv Vita Salute San Raffaele, Fac Philosophy, Milan, Italy