共 50 条
Orally Ingested Probiotic, Prebiotic, and Synbiotic Interventions as Countermeasures for Gastrointestinal Tract Infections in Nonelderly Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
被引:10
|作者:
Fagnant, Heather S.
[1
]
Isidean, Sandra D.
[2
,3
]
Wilson, Lydia
[4
]
Bukhari, Asma S.
[1
]
Allen, Jillian T.
[1
,5
]
Agans, Richard T.
[6
]
Lee, Dustin M.
[7
]
Hatch-McChesney, Adrienne
[1
]
Whitney, Claire C.
[1
]
Sullo, Elaine
[4
]
Porter, Chad K.
[2
]
Karl, J. Philip
[1
]
机构:
[1] US Army Res Inst Environm Med, Natick, MA 01760 USA
[2] Naval Med Res Ctr, Silver Spring, MD USA
[3] Henry M Jackson Fdn Advancement Mil Med Inc, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC USA
[5] Oak Ridge Inst Sci & Educ, Belcamp, MD USA
[6] US Air Force Sch Aerosp Med, Dayton, OH USA
[7] Brooke Army Med Ctr, Ft Sam Houston, TX USA
关键词:
gastrointestinal illness;
infectious diarrhea;
travelers' diarrhea;
gut microbiome;
fermentable fiber;
dietary supplement;
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC ASSOCIATION;
LACTOBACILLUS-RHAMNOSUS GG;
TRAVELERS DIARRHEA;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
CONSENSUS STATEMENT;
PREVENTION;
CHILDREN;
EFFICACY;
SUPPLEMENTATION;
RESISTANCE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.advnut.2023.02.002
中图分类号:
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生];
TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号:
100403 ;
摘要:
Meta-analyses have not examined the prophylactic use of orally ingested probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics for preventing gastrointestinal tract infections (GTIs) of various etiologies in adult populations, despite evidence that these gut microbiota-targeted interventions can be effective in treating certain GTIs. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the effects of prophylactic use of orally ingested probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on GTI incidence, duration, and severity in nonelderly, nonhospitalized adults. CENTRAL, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through January 2022. English-language, peer-reviewed publications of randomized, placebo-controlled studies testing an orally ingested probiotic, prebiotic, or synbiotic intervention of any dose for >= 1 wk in adults who were not hospitalized, immunosuppressed, or taking antibiotics were included. Results were analyzed using random-effects meta-analyses of intention-to-treat (ITT) and complete case (CC) cohorts. Heterogeneity was explored by subgroup meta-analysis and meta-regression. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 tool. Seventeen publications reporting 20 studies of probiotics (n = 16), prebiotics (n = 3), and synbiotics (n = 1) were identified (n > 6994 subjects). In CC and ITT analyses, risk of experiencing >= 1 GTI was reduced with probiotics (CC analysis-risk ratio: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.01) and prebiotics (risk ratio: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.98). No effects on GTI duration or severity were observed. Sources of heterogeneity included the study population and number of probiotic strains administered but were often unexplained, and a high risk of bias was observed for most studies. The specific effects of individual probiotic strains and prebiotic types could not be assessed owing to a lack of confirmatory studies. Findings indicated that both orally ingested probiotics and prebiotics, relative to placebo, demonstrated modest benefit for reducing GTI risk in nonelderly adults. However, results should be interpreted cautiously owing to the low number of studies, high risk of bias, and unexplained heterogeneity that may include probiotic strain-specific or prebiotic-specific effects.This review was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42020200670.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 554
页数:16
相关论文