Evaluation of HbA1c from CGM traces in an Indian population

被引:0
|
作者
Majumdar, Sayantan [1 ]
Kalamkar, Saurabh D. [2 ]
Dudhgaonkar, Shashikant [3 ]
Shelgikar, Kishor M. [4 ]
Ghaskadbi, Saroj [2 ]
Goel, Pranay [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci Educ & Res Pune, Dept Biol, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[2] Savitribai Phule Pune Univ, Dept Zool, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[3] Savitribai Phule Pune Univ, Hlth Ctr, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[4] Joshi Hosp, Dept Gen Med, Pune, Maharashtra, India
来源
关键词
continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); type 2 diabetes (T2D); average blood glucose concentration (aBG); average interstitial fluid glucose concentration (aISF); MONITORED BLOOD-GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; AVERAGE;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2023.1264072
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The development of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) over the last decade has provided access to many consecutive glucose concentration measurements from patients. A standard method for estimating glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), already established in the literature, is based on its relationship with the average blood glucose concentration (aBG). We showed that the estimates obtained using the standard method were not sufficiently reliable for an Indian population and suggested two new methods for estimating HbA1c. Methods: Two datasets providing a total of 128 CGM and their corresponding HbA1c levels were received from two centers: Health Centre, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune and Joshi Hospital, Pune, from patients already diagnosed with diabetes, non-diabetes, and pre-diabetes. We filtered 112 data-sufficient CGM traces, of which 80 traces were used to construct two models using linear regression. The first model estimates HbA1c directly from the average interstitial fluid glucose concentration (aISF) of the CGM trace and the second model proceeds in two steps: first, aISF is scaled to aBG, and then aBG is converted to HbA1c via the Nathan model. Our models were tested on the remaining 32 datasufficient traces. We also provided 95% confidence and prediction intervals for HbA1c estimates. Results: The direct model (first model) for estimating HbA1c was HbA1(cmmol/mol) = 0.319 x aISF(mg/dL) + 16.73 and the adapted Nathan model (second model) for estimating HbA1c is HbA1c(mmol/dL) = 0.38 x (1.17 x ISFmg/dL) - 5.60. Discussion: Our results show that the new equations are likely to provide better estimates of HbA1c levels than the standard model at the population level, which is especially suited for clinical epidemiology in Indian populations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improved HbA1c Estimation Using CGM Data
    Grossman, Joshua
    Ward, Andrew T.
    Maahs, David M.
    Prahalad, Priya
    Scheinker, David
    DIABETES, 2020, 69
  • [2] Impact of Bigfoot Unity Integrated CGM on HbA1c
    Haque, Paarsa
    Hall, Shareta
    Walker, Pershell
    Latif, Kashif
    DIABETES, 2023, 72
  • [3] HbA1c Measurement and CGM: Accuracy and Errors analyzed
    Kessing, Richard
    DIABETOLOGIE UND STOFFWECHSEL, 2024, 19 (04) : 242 - 243
  • [4] Estimating Glycemia From HbA1c and CGM: Analysis of Accuracy and Sources of Discrepancy
    Tozzo, Veronica
    Genco, Matthew
    Omololu, Shammah O.
    Mow, Christopher
    Patel, Hasmukh R.
    Patel, Chhaya H.
    Ho, Samantha N.
    Lam, Evie
    Abdulsater, Batoul
    Patel, Nikita
    Cohen, Robert M.
    Nathan, David M.
    Powe, Camille E.
    Wexler, Deborah J.
    Higgins, John M.
    DIABETES CARE, 2024, 47 (03) : 460 - 466
  • [5] Snapshot of CGM Metrics in Adolescents and Adults Achieving Target HbA1c Versus Those Not Meeting Target HbA1c
    Abraham, Mary B.
    Smith, Grant J.
    Fairchild, Janice M.
    King, Bruce R.
    Ambler, Geoffrey R.
    Cameron, Fergus J.
    McAuley, Sybil A.
    Keech, Anthony C.
    Jenkins, Alicia
    de Bock, Martin
    Davis, Elizabeth A.
    O'Neal, David N.
    Jones, Timothy W.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 24 (09) : 677 - 679
  • [6] Effect of CGM in the HbA1c and Coefficient of Variation of glucose in a pediatric sample
    Lou, Graciela
    Larramona, Gemma
    Montaner, Teresa
    Barbed, Sara
    PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2021, 15 (02) : 289 - 292
  • [7] Utility of HbA1c as a screening tool for diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes in Indian population
    Rajput, R.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2012, 55 : S157 - S157
  • [8] No Effect of Periodic CGM on HbA1c in Poorly Regulated Type 1 Patients
    Andersen, Henrik Ullits
    Kjelmann, Majbritt
    Wittrup, Minna
    Almdal, Thomas P.
    DIABETES, 2012, 61 : A217 - A217
  • [9] Improved individual and population-level HbA1c estimation using CGM data and patient characteristics
    Grossman, Joshua
    Ward, Andrew
    Crandell, Jamie L.
    Prahalad, Priya
    Maahs, David M.
    Scheinker, David
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2021, 35 (08)
  • [10] Clinical limitations of the relationship among mean SMBG, CGM and HbA1c
    Mazze, Roger
    Strock, Ellie
    Wesley, David
    Cuddihy, Robert M.
    DIABETES, 2008, 57 : A14 - A15