A comparison of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus to fipronil

被引:4
|
作者
Torrents, Jorgelina [1 ]
Morel, Nicolas [2 ]
Rossner, Maria, V [3 ]
Martinez, Norberto C. [4 ]
Nava, Santiago [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Litoral, Fac Ciencias Vet, Kreder 2805, RA-3080 Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina
[2] Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr, Inst Invest Cadena Lactea IDICAL, INTA CONICET, Estn Expt Agr Rafaela, CC 22, RA-2300 Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina
[3] Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr, Estn Expt Agr Colonia Benitez, Colonia Benitez, Chaco, Argentina
[4] Agencia Extens Rural Garabato, Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr, Garabato, Santa Fe, Argentina
关键词
Resistance; Rhipicephalus microplus; Firponil; Bioassay; BOOPHILUS-MICROPLUS; DISCRIMINATING CONCENTRATIONS; ACARI IXODIDAE; 1ST REPORT; INSECTICIDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.vprsr.2022.100816
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
The aim of this work is to compare the sensitivity of two in vitro bioassays to detect resistant to fipronil in Argentinean populations of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Two different larval bioassays prepared with technical grade (97%) fipronil were compared: larval immersion test (LIT) and larval packet test (LPT). Seven strains from different provinces were treated with both assays. Colonia Tabay, Colonia Benitez, Intiyaco and Quimili strains were considered resistant in both LIT and LPT bioassays. The 95% confidence intervals (IC95) for lethal concentration 50% (LC50) did not overlap with the susceptible reference strain (SRS) and all the values of RR50 obtained were higher than 2. Garabato and Federal strains were considered as susceptible for both techniques because the IC95 for the LC50 overlapped with those of the SRS and the RR50 values were lesser than 2. An ambiguous situation occurs with Reconquista strain. This strain was considered as susceptible with LPT and with incipient resistant after LIT trial. The analysis of the results indicates that both LIT and LPT trials have enough sensibility to differentiate resistant and susceptible strains, but LIT was more sensitive than LPT when the resistance is incipient.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vitro diagnosis of resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to fipronil in Argentina
    Jorgelina Torrents
    Nicolás Morel
    Maria V. Rossner
    Norberto C. Martínez
    José R. Toffaletti
    Santiago Nava
    Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2020, 82 : 397 - 403
  • [2] Diagnoses of fipronil resistance in Brazilian cattle ticks (Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus) using in vitro larval bioassays
    Castro-Janer, E.
    Martins, J. R.
    Mendes, M. C.
    Namindome, A.
    Klafke, G. M.
    Schumaker, T. T. S.
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2010, 173 (3-4) : 300 - 306
  • [3] Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) resistance to fipronil in Uruguay evaluated by in vitro bioassays
    Castro-Janer, E.
    Rifran, L.
    Gonzalez, P.
    Piaggio, J.
    Gil, A.
    Schumaker, T. T. S.
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2010, 169 (1-2) : 172 - 177
  • [4] Host resistance in cattle to infestation with the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus
    Jonsson, N. N.
    Piper, E. K.
    Constantinoiu, C. C.
    PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 36 (11) : 551 - 557
  • [5] Resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to fluazuron in Argentina
    Torrents, Jorgelina
    Sarli, Macarena
    Sarmiento, Nestor F.
    Rossner, Maria V.
    Morel, Nicolas
    Guglielmone, Alberto A.
    Nava, Santiago
    EXPERIMENTAL AND APPLIED ACAROLOGY, 2022, 86 (04) : 599 - 606
  • [6] Resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to ivermectin in Argentina
    Torrents, Jorgelina
    Sarli, Macarena
    Rossner, Maria, V
    Toffaletti, Jose R.
    Morel, Nicolas
    Martinez, Norberto C.
    Webster, Anelise
    Mangold, Atilio J.
    Guglielmone, Alberto A.
    Nava, Santiago
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 132 : 332 - 337
  • [7] Resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to fluazuron in Argentina
    Jorgelina Torrents
    Macarena Sarli
    Nestor F. Sarmiento
    Maria V. Rossner
    Nicolas Morel
    Alberto A. Guglielmone
    Santiago Nava
    Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2022, 86 : 599 - 606
  • [8] Rhipicephalus microplus (Southern cattle tick; Asian blue tick)
    Oyen, Kennan
    Poh, Karen C.
    TRENDS IN PARASITOLOGY, 2025, 41 (01) : 68 - 69
  • [9] A new in vitro test to evaluate the resistance level against acaricides of the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus
    Lovis, L.
    Perret, J-L
    Bouvier, J.
    Fellay, J-M
    Kaminsky, R.
    Betschart, B.
    Sager, H.
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2011, 182 (2-4) : 269 - 280
  • [10] Mechanisms of acaricide resistance in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Sri Lanka
    Bandara, K. M. U. Janadaree
    Karunaratne, S. H. P. Parakrama
    PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 139 : 68 - 72