Prognostic value of circulating plasma cells detected by flow cytometry in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Xiaoyan [1 ]
Wu, Feifei [1 ]
Ye, Wu [2 ]
Deng, Jili [3 ]
Zhang, Mengmeng [1 ]
Zhang, Congli [1 ]
Yu, Qingfeng [1 ]
Cao, Li [1 ]
Gan, Silin [1 ]
Ma, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Hematol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Dept Hematol, West China Hosp, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Lymphoma, Key Lab Carcinogenesis & Translat Res, Minist Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
HAEMATOLOGY; Myeloma; Prognosis; RISK; QUANTIFICATION; PREDICTOR;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071548
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder. The most widely accepted staging system for MM is the revised International Staging System based on cytogenetic and clinical biomarkers. The circulating clonal plasma cells (CPCs) were reported to have potential prognostic impact on MM. Among various diagnostic approaches, multiparametric flow cytometry (FCM) offers heightened sensitivity, minimal invasiveness and reproducibility. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of quantifying CPCs via FCM in newly diagnosed symptomatic MM (NDMM) patients.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data source PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and references of included studies.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies We included observational studies that evaluated the prognostic value of CPCs detected by FCM in NDMM.Data extraction and synthesis Data were screened and extracted independently by two investigators. The pooled results originated from random effects models. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). To evaluate the prognostic value of CPCs in NDMM, HRs and their 95% CI for both OS and PFS were derived using COX multivariable models. These values were then used to compute the pooled estimated effect.Results Our meta-analysis encompassed a total of 2704 NDMM patients from 11 studies up to 27 August 2022. The pooled HR for OS and PFS in CPC-positive (CPCs+) group and CPC-negative group were 1.95 (95% CI 1.24 to 3.07) and 2.07 (95% CI 1.79 to 2.39), respectively. The autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) failed to eliminate the adverse impact on OS and PFS. The heterogeneity may stem from the use of novel agents or traditional chemotherapy as initial treatment.Conclusion This meta-analysis indicates CPCs+ had an adverse impact on the prognosis of NDMM patients in the total population, and the adverse impact could not be eliminated by ASCT.PROSPERO registration number CRD42021272381.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Circulating plasma cells detected by flow cytometry as a predictor of survival in 302 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
    Nowakowski, GS
    Witzig, TE
    Dingli, D
    Tracz, MJ
    Gertz, MA
    Lacy, MQ
    Lust, JA
    Dispenzieri, A
    Greipp, PR
    Kyle, RA
    Rajkumar, SV
    BLOOD, 2005, 106 (07) : 2276 - 2279
  • [2] Circulating plasma cells detected by flow cytometry as a predictor of survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
    Nowakowski, GS
    Witzig, TE
    Dingli, D
    Tracz, MJ
    Greipp, PR
    Rajkumar, SV
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 580S - 580S
  • [4] Quantification of circulating clonal plasma cells by multiparametric flow cytometry as a prognostic marker in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
    Sathya, Pandurangan
    Kayal, Smita
    Srinivas, B. H.
    Hamide, Abdoul
    Kar, Rakhee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 45 (06) : 917 - 926
  • [5] Phenotypic and Prognostic Evaluation of Circulating Plasma Cells in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Detected with Next-Generation Flow Cytometry (NGF)
    Kostopoulos, Ioannis
    Papanota, Aristina
    Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis
    Papadimitriou, Kostas
    Malandrakis, Panagiotis
    Eleftherakis-Papaiakovou, Evangelos
    Rousakis, Pantelis
    Panteli, Chrysanthi
    Kanellias, Nikos
    Fotiou, Despoina
    Migkou, Magda
    Gavriatopoulou, Maria
    Kastritis, Efstathios
    Tsitsilonis, Ourania
    Dimopoulos, Meletios-Athanasios
    Terpos, Evangelos
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2020, 20 : S297 - S298
  • [6] Prognostic value of circulating clonal plasma cells in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
    Han, Wenmin
    Jin, Yuanyuan
    Xu, Min
    Zhao, Si-Shu
    Shi, Qinglin
    Qu, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Run
    Li, Jianyong
    Wu, Yujie
    Chen, Lijuan
    HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 26 (01) : 510 - 517
  • [7] The prognostic significance of circulating plasma cells in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients
    Yao, Weiqin
    Yang, Haifei
    You, Hongying
    Shang, Jingjing
    Zhai, Yingying
    Yan, Zhi
    Yan, Shuang
    Shi, Xiaolan
    Yao, Ying
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Panfeng
    Xu, Yun
    Jin, Song
    Yan, Lingzhi
    Wu, Depei
    Fu, Chengcheng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [8] Prognostic Value Of Quantifying Circulating Plasma Cells By Multiparametric Flow Cytometry In Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
    Gonsalves, Wilson I.
    Gupta, Vinay
    Rajkumar, S. Vincent
    Morice, William G.
    Timm, Michael M.
    Singh, Preet Paul
    Gertz, Morie A.
    Buadi, Francis K.
    Lacy, Martha Q.
    Kapoor, Prashant
    Dispenzieri, Angela
    Kumar, Shaji K.
    BLOOD, 2013, 122 (21)
  • [9] Prognostic value of circulating plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis (Publication with Expression of Concern)
    Li, Jia
    Wang, Ningning
    Tesfaluul, Nahom
    Gao, Xiaojuan
    Liu, Shuai
    Yue, Baohong
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07):
  • [10] Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohyuddin, Ghulam Rehman
    Aziz, Muhammad
    McClune, Brian
    Abdallah, Al-Ola
    Qazilbash, Muzaffar
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2020, 104 (05) : 420 - 426