GMO discussion on Twitter

被引:1
|
作者
Erokhin, Dmitry [1 ,2 ]
Komendantova, Nadejda [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Adv Syst Anal, Laxenburg, Austria
[2] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
来源
GM CROPS & FOOD-BIOTECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURE AND THE FOOD CHAIN | 2023年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Conspiracy; GMO; misinformation; sentiment analysis; Twitter; SENTIMENT; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1080/21645698.2023.2241160
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on analyzing discussions related to Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) on Twitter, with a specific focus on the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories. The authors collected and analyzed 1,048,274 English tweets related to GMOs between January 2020 and December 2022 using the Twitter API. The tweets were subjected to topical and sentiment analysis to identify the prevalent themes and attitudes toward GMOs. 30.92% of the tweets in the observed period were negative, 21.65% were neutral, and 47.43% were positive. The authors identified four clusters of tweets associated with misinformation or conspiracy theories: GMOs and vaccines, GMOs and COVID-19, GMOs and Monsanto, and GMOs and Bill Gates. The findings of this analysis can inform strategies for combating the spread of false information and conspiracies on social media and improve public understanding and trust in GMO technology.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Join the discussion on Twitter!
    Cardona-Grau, Diana
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2016, 12 (06) : 334 - 334
  • [2] Affectivity in the #jesuisCharlie Twitter discussion
    Johansson, Marjut
    Laippala, Veronika
    PRAGMATICS, 2020, 30 (02): : 179 - 200
  • [3] Quality of the discussion of asthma on twitter
    Kaul, Viren
    Szakmany, Tamas
    Peters, Jay, I
    Stukus, David
    Sala, Kathleen A.
    Dangayach, Neha
    Simpson, Steven Q.
    Carroll, Christopher L.
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2022, 59 (02) : 325 - 332
  • [4] EATING DISORDER DISCUSSION ON TWITTER
    Suthamjariya, Nina
    Arseniev, Alina
    Moreno, Megan
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2016, 58 (02) : S37 - S37
  • [5] Earthquake conspiracy discussion on Twitter
    Erokhin, Dmitry
    Komendantova, Nadejda
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [6] Earthquake conspiracy discussion on Twitter
    Dmitry Erokhin
    Nadejda Komendantova
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11
  • [7] Personality traits, basic individual values and GMO risk perception of twitter users
    Whittingham, Nathaniel
    Boecker, Andreas
    Grygorczyk, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2020, 23 (04) : 522 - 540
  • [8] Detecting discussion communities on vaccination in twitter
    Bello-Orgaz, Gema
    Hernandez-Castro, Julio
    Camacho, David
    FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2017, 66 : 125 - 136
  • [9] RESEARCHING NEWS DISCUSSION ON TWITTER New methodologies
    Bruns, Axel
    Burgess, Jean
    JOURNALISM STUDIES, 2012, 13 (5-6) : 801 - 814
  • [10] A national discussion of COVID-19 on Twitter
    Diaz, Marlon, I
    Lehmann, Christoph U.
    Lam, Philip W.
    Medford, Richard J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE CANADA (JAMMI), 2024, 9 (04): : 294 - 307