Teaching Oncology Nurses a Psychosocial Intervention for Advanced Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study

被引:2
|
作者
van Klinken, Merel [1 ]
Hafkamp, Emma [1 ]
van Weezel, Anne Gualtherie [1 ]
Hales, Sarah [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lanceley, Anne [5 ]
Rodin, Gary [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Schulz-Quach, Christian [2 ,3 ,4 ]
de Vries, Froukje [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Ctr Qual Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Support Care, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Global Inst Psychosocial Oncol & Palliat Care GIPP, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] UCL, EGA Inst Womens Hlth, Dept Womens Canc, London, England
[6] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Psychiat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
CALM; Cancer; Education nursing; Palliative care; Psychosocial; COMMUNICATION-SKILLS; JOB STRESS; OF-LIFE; CARE; SATISFACTION; EDUCATION; PROGRAM; BURNOUT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151507
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Psychological interventions for advanced cancer patients are effective in decreasing distress but are not well integrated into cancer care. Oncology nurses are well positioned to deliver such interventions, and their participation may enhance professional satisfaction and wellbeing. Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) is an evidence-based psychotherapy supporting advanced cancer patients. A CALM-Nurses (CALM-N) training program was developed to teach oncology nurses the basics of CALM for use in daily practice. Feasibility and acceptability of CALM-N and its impact on professional wellbeing were assessed in this pilot study.Data Sources: Fifty-five nurses attended CALM-N in three groups. Thirty-five nurses completed the first e-learning, 29 nurses (83%) attended the first group session, and 22 (63%) attended all sessions. At baseline, 35 questionnaires were collected. Response rate at follow-up was 63% for Jefferson Scale of Empathy (n=22), 66% for self-efficacy scale (n=23), and for subscales of Professional Quality of Life Scale burnout; 51% (n=18), secondary traumatic stress; 49% (n=17), compassion satisfaction; 57% (n=20). A statistically significant increase in self-efficacy was found, but there were no significant changes in PROQOL and empathy. Focus groups suggested CALM-N helped nurses' understanding of patients and nurse-patient communication and increased reflection and perspective taking. Conclusion: CALM-N is a feasible and acceptable intervention for oncology nurses, with the potential to improve nurse-patient communication and the nurses' reflective capacities. Implications for Nursing Practice: CALM-N has the potential to improve the capacity of oncology nurses to provide psychosocial care for advanced cancer patients and its application to nursing practice merits further investigation.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acceptability and feasibility of an online psychosocial intervention for Dutch adolescents with a visible difference: A mixed-methods study
    van Dalen, M.
    Pasmans, S. G. M. A.
    Aendekerk, E. W. C.
    Mathijssen, I. M. J.
    Koudstaal, M. J.
    Williamson, H.
    Hillegers, M. H. J.
    Utens, E. M. W. J.
    Okkerse, J. M. E.
    BODY IMAGE, 2022, 41 : 298 - 307
  • [2] "DO NOT RESUSCITATE," ONCOLOGY NURSES' INTERPRETATIONS AND MISCONCEPTIONS: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Lee, Joyce
    Baker, Kathy
    Hodges, Karen
    Kelly, Patricia A.
    Lockwood, Suzy
    Vuong, Ellen
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2022, 49 (02) : E158 - E158
  • [3] Definition and improvement of the concept and tools of a psychosocial intervention program for parents in pediatric oncology: a mixed-methods feasibility study conducted with parents and healthcare professionals
    David Ogez
    Claude-Julie Bourque
    Katherine Péloquin
    Rebeca Ribeiro
    Laurence Bertout
    Daniel Curnier
    Simon Drouin
    Caroline Laverdière
    Valérie Marcil
    Émélie Rondeau
    Daniel Sinnett
    Serge Sultan
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 5
  • [4] Definition and improvement of the concept and tools of a psychosocial intervention program for parents in pediatric oncology: a mixed-methods feasibility study conducted with parents and healthcare professionals
    Ogez, David
    Bourque, Claude-Julie
    Peloquin, Katherine
    Ribeiro, Rebeca
    Bertout, Laurence
    Curnier, Daniel
    Drouin, Simon
    Laverdiere, Caroline
    Marcil, Valerie
    Rondeau, Emelie
    Sinnett, Daniel
    Sultan, Serge
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2019, 5 (01)
  • [5] Integration of child life into adult oncology: A mixed-methods feasibility study
    Lysecki, David L.
    Bainbridge, Daryl
    Akitt, Tracy
    Georgiou, Georgia
    McKean, Heather
    Meyer, Ralph M.
    Sussman, Jonathan
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 33 (06)
  • [6] DISTRESS SCREENING FOR ONCOLOGY FAMILY CAREGIVERS: A MIXED-METHODS FEASIBILITY STUDY
    Shaffer, Kelly M.
    Benvengo, Stephanie
    Zaleta, Alexandra K.
    Levine, Marcia R.
    Bellantoni, Courtney E.
    Dannaoui, Aimee
    Buzaglo, Joanne
    Applebaum, Allison
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 : S13 - S13
  • [7] Advancing Spiritual Care Research in Psychosocial Oncology: Example of a Mixed-Methods Study
    Dunn, Laura
    Kestenbaum, Allison
    Rabow, Michael
    Hocker, Will
    Dohan, Daniel
    James, Jennifer
    Shields, Michele
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 : 51 - 51
  • [8] Harnessing mixed-methods designs to advance psychosocial oncology research: Illustrations from the study of cancer pain
    Hildenbrand, Aimee
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 29 : 57 - 57
  • [9] Canadian oncology physiotherapists' perspectives of physical activity in people with advanced cancer: a mixed-methods study
    Shallwani, Shirin M.
    Thomas, Roanne
    Poitras, Stephane
    Toupin-April, Karine
    Sheill, Grainne
    King, Judy
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 40 (06) : 1281 - 1299
  • [10] An intervention to improve outcomes of falls in dementia: the DIFRID mixed-methods feasibility study
    Allan, Louise M.
    Wheatley, Alison
    Smith, Amy
    Flynn, Elizabeth
    Homer, Tara
    Robalino, Shannon
    Beyer, Fiona R.
    Foxo, Christopher
    Howel, Denise
    Barber, Robert
    Connolly, Jim Anthony
    Robinson, Louise
    Parry, Steve Wayne
    Rochester, Lynn
    Corner, Lynne
    Bamford, Claire
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2019, 23 (59) : 1 - +