Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service

被引:1
|
作者
Salm, Sandra [1 ,2 ]
Houwaart, Stefanie [3 ]
Cecon-Stabel, Natalia [1 ,4 ]
Dresen, Antje [1 ]
Pfaff, Holger [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Scholten, Nadine [1 ]
Krieger, Theresia [1 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Inst Med Sociol Hlth Serv Res & Rehabil Sci IMVR, Fac Med,Fac Human Sci, Eupener Str 129, D-50933 Cologne, Germany
[2] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Gen Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] House Canc Patient Support Assoc Germany HKSH BV, Bonn, Germany
[4] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Unit Hlth Serv Res Childhood & Adolescence, Clin Gen Pediat Neonatol & Pediat Cardiol, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf,Med Fac, Dusseldorf, Germany
[5] Univ Cologne, Chair Qual Dev & Evaluat Rehabil, Hlth Serv Res & Rehabil Sci, Fac Med,Fac Human Sci,Inst Med Sociol, Cologne, Germany
[6] Univ Cologne, Chair Qual Dev & Evaluat Rehabil, Hlth Serv Res & Rehabil Sci, Univ Hosp Cologne,Fac Human Sci,Inst Med Sociol, Cologne, Germany
[7] Univ Cologne, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Cologne, Germany
[8] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Fac Med, Dept Med Psychol Neuropsychol, Cologne, Germany
[9] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Ctr Neuropsychol Diagnost & Intervent CeNDI, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Peer support; Cancer; Psycho-oncology; Information provision; Evaluation; Mixed methods; CANCER-PATIENTS; PROGRAMS; CONTEXT; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1007/s00432-023-04951-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeOne-to-one peer supporters called isPO onco-guides (isPO OGs) are an integral part of the new German psycho-oncological form of care 'integrated, cross-sectoral Psycho-Oncology' (isPO), additionally to professional care. The isPO OGs are cancer survivors with experiential knowledge, offering information on local support services and answering questions 'all around cancer' to newly diagnosed cancer patients. We aimed to evaluate the isPO OG service from three perspectives: patients, isPO OGs, and professional service providers.MethodsA mixed-methods approach was pursued. We conducted interviews and focus groups with the three person groups, and applied qualitative content analysis on the reported resources, processes and outcomes regarding the isPO OG service. Relations with patients' utilisation and isPO OGs' work satisfaction were identified with regression and correlation analyses of questionnaire and isPO care data. We compared isPO care networks (CN) with X-2-tests or ANOVA. Qualitative and quantitative results were integrated during interpretation phase.ResultsQualitatively, the three person groups agreed on the benefits of the isPO OG service. The implementation's maturity differed between the CN concerning established processes and resource availability. Attitudes of professional service providers appeared to be crucial for patients' utilisation of the isPO OG service. Quantitative results emphasised the differences between the CN.ConclusionBeyond differences in the CN, the isPO OG service has two psychosocial benefits: providing relevant, reliable, and understandable information; and offering the encouraging example that surviving and living with cancer is possible.
引用
收藏
页码:10399 / 10422
页数:24
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service
    Sandra Salm
    Stefanie Houwaart
    Natalia Cecon-Stabel
    Antje Dresen
    Holger Pfaff
    Nadine Scholten
    Theresia Krieger
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2023, 149 : 10399 - 10422
  • [2] Evaluation of a complex integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program (isPO): a mixed-methods study protocol
    Jenniches, Imke
    Lemmen, Clarissa
    Cwik, Jan Christopher
    Kusch, Michael
    Labouvie, Hildegard
    Scholten, Nadine
    Gerlach, Alexander
    Stock, Stephanie
    Samel, Christina
    Hagemeier, Anna
    Hellmich, Martin
    Haas, Peter
    Hallek, Michael
    Pfaff, Holger
    Dresen, Antje
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):