Mapping of Energy Communities in Europe: Status Quo and Review of Existing Classifications

被引:19
|
作者
Koltunov, Maksym [1 ,2 ]
Pezzutto, Simon [2 ]
Bisello, Adriano [2 ]
Lettner, Georg [3 ]
Hiesl, Albert [3 ]
van Sark, Wilfried [4 ]
Louwen, Atse [2 ]
Wilczynski, Eric [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trieste, DEAMS Bruno de Finetti, Piazzale Europa 1, I-34127 Trieste, Italy
[2] Inst Renewable Energy, Eurac Res, Viale Druso 1, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
[3] TU Wien, Inst Energy Syst & Elect Drives, Gusshausstr 25,E370-3, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3583 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
energy communities; community energy; European Union; mapping; classification; status quo; RENEWABLE ENERGY; COOPERATIVES; TRANSITION; FUTURE; POLICY; OPPORTUNITIES; BENEFITS; BARRIERS; GERMANY;
D O I
10.3390/su15108201
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A lack of aggregate analysis concerning energy communities exists in the academic literature. The authors utilized a combination of literature reviews and desk research to fill this gap. The existing debate on the classification of energy communities was summarized and aligned. Discovered classifications were used to analyze the status quo of the sector. The authors found nearly 4000 energy communities with 900,000 members in the European Union. On average, there are 844 members per one energy community. Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, and the United Kingdom are at the forefront of the movement. Different countries have different primary sources of renewable energy utilized by energy communities, and membership structures vary based on the energy source and corporate purpose of the energy community together with the sector's maturity in a certain country. Predominantly, hydro and biomass are used by energy communities in Alpine countries, solar energy is used in Germany, Spain, and France, wind in the Netherlands and Denmark, and different renewables in the United Kingdom. More members have joined the hydro, biomass, and wind communities than solar communities. Each country has national and regional associations of energy communities. In addition, intermediary actors, researchers, and consultancy agencies have shown a growing interest in the deployment of the movement. Achieving a conformity of business models Europe-wide would probably be impossible and pointless. Distinct geographical, institutional, and policy context-specific conditions stimulate diversity rather than conformity.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Europe: The impossible status quo
    Pinder, J
    JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 1998, 36 (02): : 275 - 275
  • [2] Europe: the impossible status quo.
    Wallace, W
    INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 1998, 74 (01) : 223 - 224
  • [3] Definitions of Positive Energy Districts: A Review of the Status Quo and Challenges
    Albert-Seifried, Vicky
    Murauskaite, Lina
    Massa, Gilda
    Aelenei, Laura
    Baer, Daniela
    Krangsas, Savis Gohari
    Alpagut, Beril
    Mutule, Anna
    Pokorny, Nikola
    Vandevyvere, Han
    SUSTAINABILITY IN ENERGY AND BUILDINGS 2021, 2022, 263 : 493 - 506
  • [4] Constructing justice for existing practice: Rawls and the status quo
    James, A
    PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2005, 33 (03) : 281 - 316
  • [5] AIDS IN EUROPE, STATUS QUO 1983 - RECOMMENDATIONS
    不详
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1984, 20 (02): : 169 - 173
  • [6] The Gravity of Status Quo: A Review of IEA's World Energy Outlook
    Mohn, Klaus
    ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2020, 9 (01) : 63 - 81
  • [7] Status quo of offshore wind energy: Europe must strengthen its industrial base
    Koenemann, Detlef
    BWK- Energie-Fachmagazin, 2023, 75 (9-10): : 38 - 41
  • [8] Mapping earthworm communities in Europe
    Rutgers, Michiel
    Orgiazzi, Alberto
    Gardi, Ciro
    Roembke, Joerg
    Jaensch, Stephan
    Keith, Aidan M.
    Neilson, Roy
    Boag, Brian
    Schmidt, Olaf
    Murchie, Archie K.
    Blackshaw, Rod P.
    Peres, Guenola
    Cluzeau, Daniel
    Guernion, Muriel
    Briones, Maria J. I.
    Rodeiro, Javier
    Pineiro, Raul
    Diaz Cosin, Dario J.
    Paulo Sousa, J.
    Suhadolc, Marjetka
    Kos, Ivan
    Krogh, Paul-Henning
    Faber, Jack H.
    Mulder, Christian
    Bogte, Jaap J.
    van Wijnen, Harm J.
    Schouten, Anton J.
    de Zwart, Dick
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2016, 97 : 98 - 111
  • [9] Accounting and Controlling in Communities: Status quo and Reform Ideas
    Hurlebaus, Annette
    BETRIEBSWIRTSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS, 2010, 62 (05): : 579 - 580
  • [10] Overall review of distributed energy development in China: Status quo, barriers and solutions
    Zeng Ming
    Ouyang Shaojie
    Shi Hui
    Ge Yujian
    Qian Qiqi
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 : 1226 - 1238