All-or-Nothing Enactivism: For Whom, To Do What?

Responses to our utopian scientific distinction ranged from expansion of our ideas to rejecting the distinction. Taking up these innovations and critiques, we also adopt a critical stance towards moves to collapse the division between theory and science, both in general and in the case of our distinction. We argue against the view that enactivist theorising and science are too interwoven to be distinguished from each other. Finally, we advocate for an end to enactivism as an -ism, urging for diversification and integration.