Transoral robotic surgery - time for consensus on pain assessment. A review

被引:1
|
作者
Larsen, Mikkel Hjordt Holm [1 ,3 ]
Kehlet, Henrik [2 ]
von Buchwald, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg & Audiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Sect Surg Pathophysiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg & Audiol, Sect 6033, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Pain; recovery; transoral robotic surgery; OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA; MOVEMENT-EVOKED PAIN; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TONGUE BASE; OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER; MANAGEMENT; TORS; OUTCOMES; COST; CARE;
D O I
10.1080/00016489.2023.2282149
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: In Head and Neck surgery Transoral Robotic Surgery ( TORS) is evolving as a key treatment option for benign and malignant lesions in the oropharynx. Even so, postoperative pain is one of the primary early complaints following TORS. Well established evidence-based procedure specific pain treatment guidelines are available for a variety of other surgical specialties. However, there are no guidelines for TORS Aim: This review describes the available data of early pain intensity following TORS during rest and procedure related activity. Methods: Literature concerning pain in the immediate postoperative phase following TORS were obtained from two literature databases Results: Most data on pain intensity following TORS are based upon a numeric rating scale, e.g. the Visual Analogue Scale and/or analgesic demands. Only one randomized clinical trial is available reflecting that the literature is mainly based on retrospective and a few prospective studies. Only one study analyzed pain during relevant functionality, i.e. swallowing. Overall, the studies suffer from a non-standardized approach and there is a need for transparent information concerning the timing of pain ratings and methodology Conclusions: The evidence for optimal pain control is limited, particularly during surgical relevant activity. Postoperative pain rating during activity is a fundamental element in pain trials in order to enhance recovery thereby calling for future consensus on assessment methodology
引用
收藏
页码:902 / 911
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Scoping Review of Pain Management After Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Snyder, Vusala
    Kraft, Daniel O.
    Creamer, Andrew
    Spector, Matthew E.
    Sridharan, Shaum S.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2024, 171 (06) : 1617 - 1627
  • [2] Assessment of Margins in Transoral Laser and Robotic Surgery
    Hamzany, Yaniv
    Brasnu, Daniel
    Shpitzer, Thomas
    Shvero, Jacob
    RAMBAM MAIMONIDES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 5 (02):
  • [3] Assessment of intraoperative safety in transoral robotic surgery
    Hockstein, NG
    O'Malley, BW
    Weinstein, GS
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2006, 116 (02): : 165 - 168
  • [4] Transoral robotic surgery
    Weinstein, Gregory S.
    O'Malley, Bert W., Jr.
    Snyder, Wendy
    Sherman, Eric
    Quon, Harry
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2007, 133 (12) : 1220 - 1226
  • [5] Assessment of Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) Content on YouTube
    Akbar, Mohammed D.
    Taufique, Abdul K.
    Kamran, Daniyaal A.
    Harris, Abdul R.
    Lyons, James
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [6] Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Karthik N. Rao
    Kranthi Kumar Gangiti
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 12 : 847 - 853
  • [7] Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Yee, Shokjean
    AORN JOURNAL, 2017, 105 (01) : 73 - 81
  • [8] Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Rao, Karthik N.
    Gangiti, Kranthi Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (04) : 847 - 853
  • [9] Transoral Robotic Surgery for Eagle Syndrome: A Systematic Review
    Keirns, Darby
    Asarkar, Ameya
    Entezami, Payam
    Ware, Erin
    Nagel, Thomas H.
    Chang, Brent A.
    ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [10] Financial outcomes of transoral robotic surgery: A narrative review
    Othman, Sammy
    McKinnon, Brian J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 39 (04) : 448 - 452