A predictive model for consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury

被引:2
|
作者
Zhou, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yuanyi [3 ]
Liu, Ziyuan [1 ,2 ]
You, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Siming [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Ganzhi [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Yang [4 ]
Wang, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Xiangya Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Cent Stomatol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Intelligence Sci & Technol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
acute brain injury; coma; electroencephalogram (EEG); mismatch negativity (MMN); prognosis; prediction model; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY MMN; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; POTENTIALS; DISORDERS; PATTERNS; STATES;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2023.1088666
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
BackgroundPredicting the consciousness recovery for comatose patients with acute brain injury is an important issue. Although some efforts have been made in the study of prognostic assessment methods, it is still unclear which factors can be used to establish model to directly predict the probability of consciousness recovery. ObjectivesWe aimed to establish a model using clinical and neuroelectrophysiological indicators to predict consciousness recovery of comatose patients after acute brain injury. MethodsThe clinical data of patients with acute brain injury admitted to the neurosurgical intensive care unit of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May 2019 to May 2022, who underwent electroencephalogram (EEG) and auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) examinations within 28 days after coma onset, were collected. The prognosis was assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 3 months after coma onset. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was applied to select the most relevant predictors. We combined Glasgow coma scale (GCS), EEG, and absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz to develop a predictive model using binary logistic regression and then presented by a nomogram. The predictive efficiency of the model was evaluated with AUC and verified by calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the prediction model. ResultsA total of 116 patients were enrolled for analysis, of which 60 had favorable prognosis (GOS >= 3). Five predictors, including GCS (OR = 13.400, P < 0.001), absolute amplitude of MMN at Fz site (FzMMNA, OR = 1.855, P = 0.038), EEG background activity (OR = 4.309, P = 0.023), EEG reactivity (OR = 4.154, P = 0.030), and sleep spindles (OR = 4.316, P = 0.031), were selected in the model by LASSO and binary logistic regression analysis. This model showed favorable predictive power, with an AUC of 0.939 (95% CI: 0.899-0.979), and calibration. The threshold probability of net benefit was between 5% and 92% in the DCA. ConclusionThis predictive model for consciousness recovery in patients with acute brain injury is based on a nomogram incorporating GCS, EEG background activity, EEG reactivity, sleep spindles, and FzMMNA, which can be conveniently obtained during hospitalization. It provides a basis for care givers to make subsequent medical decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recovery of consciousness after acute brain injury: a narrative review
    Egawa, Satoshi
    Ader, Jeremy
    Claassen, Jan
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 12 (01):
  • [2] Early immunological defects in comatose patients after acute brain injury
    Wolach, B
    Sazbon, L
    Gavrieli, R
    Broda, A
    Schlesinger, M
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 94 (05) : 706 - 711
  • [3] THE FEATURES OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY WITH ACUTE DETERIORATION AFTER RECOVERY OF CONSCIOUSNESS
    Tanaka, Tasuke
    Wakai, Akinori
    Ohnishi, Mitsuo
    Sadamitsu, Daikai
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2014, 31 (05) : A36 - A36
  • [4] Resting-State EEG Signature of Early Consciousness Recovery in Comatose Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
    Alkhachroum, Ayham
    Flo, Emilia
    Manolovitz, Brian
    Cohan, Holly
    Shammassian, Berje
    Bass, Danielle
    Aklepi, Gabriela
    Monexe, Esther
    Ghamasaee, Pardis
    Sobczak, Evie
    Samano, Daniel
    Saavedra, Ana Bolanos
    Massad, Nina
    Kottapally, Mohan
    Merenda, Amedeo
    Cordeiro, Joacir Graciolli
    Jagid, Jonathan
    Kanner, Andres M.
    Rundek, Tatjana
    O'Phelan, Kristine
    Claassen, Jan
    Sitt, Jacobo D.
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2024, 41 (03) : 855 - 865
  • [5] Effects of sensory stimulation on level of consciousness in comatose patients after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review
    Alashram, Anas R.
    Annino, Giuseppe
    Aldajah, Salameh
    Hamad, Sakher Bani
    Aliswed, Besan
    Padua, Elvira
    PHYSIOTHERAPY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2020, 41 (02) : 143 - 153
  • [6] Neural oscillations track recovery of consciousness in acute traumatic brain injury patients
    Frohlich, Joel
    Crone, Julia S.
    Johnson, Micah A.
    Lutkenhoff, Evan S.
    Spivak, Norman M.
    Dell'Italia, John
    Hipp, Joerg F.
    Shrestha, Vikesh
    Tejeda, Jesus E. Ruiz
    Real, Courtney
    Vespa, Paul M.
    Monti, Martin M.
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2022, 43 (06) : 1804 - 1820
  • [7] Recovery of consciousness after brain injury: a mesocircuit hypothesis
    Schiff, Nicholas D.
    TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2010, 33 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [8] A predictive model for awakening in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness after craniocerebral injury
    Huang, Lianghua
    Kang, Junwei
    Zhong, Yuan
    Zhang, Jieyuan
    Qiang, Mengxiang
    Feng, Zhen
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (02) : E36701
  • [9] Early rehabilitation of comatose patients after traumatic brain injury
    Lippert-Gruener, Marcela
    NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2010, 44 (05) : 475 - 480
  • [10] Parallel recovery of consciousness and sleep in acute traumatic brain injury
    Duclos, Catherine
    Dumont, Marie
    Arbour, Caroline
    Paquet, Jean
    Blais, Helene
    Menon, David K.
    De Beaumont, Louis
    Bernard, Francis
    Gosselin, Nadia
    NEUROLOGY, 2017, 88 (03) : 268 - 275