Having the right face for the job: The effect of facial width-to-height ratio on job selection preferences

被引:3
|
作者
Deska, Jason C. [1 ]
Hingston, Sean T. [2 ]
Lundin, Madeline [3 ]
Hugenberg, Kurt [4 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Dept Mkt Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Gartner Inc, Arlington, VA USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Dept Brain & Psychol Sci, Bloomington, IN USA
关键词
appearance; bias; facial width-to-height ratio; hiring; trait inferences; BLUE-COLLAR; AGE-DISCRIMINATION; GENDER STEREOTYPES; WORK; BIAS; APPLICANTS; METAANALYSIS; DECISIONS; PREDICTS;
D O I
10.1111/bjso.12604
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Prior research has found that various job candidate characteristics can influence hiring decisions. The current work used experimental methods to test how a novel, appearance-based cue known as a facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) can bias hiring preferences. A first study provides evidence for our initial hypothesis: people believed high fWHR candidates would be a better fit for blue-collar jobs compared with low fWHR candidates, who were in turn favoured for white-collar jobs. A second study replicates this initial finding and extends it by demonstrating that the effect of fWHR-derived trait inferences of strength and intelligence on hireability predictably varies by job type. Finally, in a third study, we find that this bias reverses when traditional stereotypes of blue-collar and white-collar jobs requiring physicality and intellect are subverted, finding that perceptions of the fit between face type and presumed job requirements matter most for hiring preferences. Together, these findings demonstrate how a seemingly subtle appearance-based cue can have robust implications for hiring.
引用
收藏
页码:898 / 909
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is Male Facial Width-to-Height Ratio the Target of Sexual Selection?
    Barnaby J. W. Dixson
    Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2018, 47 : 827 - 828
  • [2] Is Male Facial Width-to-Height Ratio the Target of Sexual Selection?
    Dixson, Barnaby J. W.
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2018, 47 (04) : 827 - 828
  • [3] The facial width-to-height ratio determines interpersonal distance preferences in the observer
    Lieberz, Klara A.
    Windmann, Sabine
    Geniole, Shawn N.
    McCormick, Cheryl M.
    Mueller-Engelmann, Meike
    Gruener, Felix
    Bornefeld-Ettmann, Pia
    Steil, Regina
    AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 2017, 43 (05) : 460 - 470
  • [4] Automatic processing of facial width-to-height ratio
    Wang Hailing
    Chen Enguang
    Lian Yujing
    Li Jingjing
    Wang Liwei
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 55 (11) : 1745 - 1761
  • [5] Facial width-to-height ratio and celebrity endorsements
    Huh, HaengRyang
    Yi, DongSoo
    Zhu, HongYang
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 68 : 43 - 47
  • [6] Politicians' Facial Width-to-Height Ratio and their Electoral Success
    Banai, Irena Pavela
    Banai, Benjamin
    Mavar, Mladen
    PSIHOLOGIJSKE TEME, 2020, 29 (03): : 589 - 606
  • [7] The face of the brand: Spokesperson facial width-to-height ratio predicts brand personality judgments
    Deska, Jason C.
    Hingston, Sean T.
    DelVecchio, Devon
    Stenstrom, Eric P.
    Walker, Ryan J.
    Hugenberg, Kurt
    PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2022, 39 (08) : 1487 - 1503
  • [8] Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach
    Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.
    Albert, Graham
    Richardson, George B.
    McHale, Timothy S.
    Weinberg, Seth M.
    Gurven, Michael
    Gaulin, Steven J. C.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [9] Facial width-to-height ratio predicts psychopathic traits in males
    Anderl, Christine
    Hahn, Tim
    Schmidt, Ann-Kathrin
    Moldenhauer, Heike
    Notebaert, Karolien
    Clement, Celina Chantal
    Windmann, Sabine
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 88 : 99 - 101
  • [10] Is facial width-to-height ratio reliably associated with social inferences?
    Durkee, Patrick K.
    Ayers, Jessica D.
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 42 (06) : 583 - 592