Does preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment of high-risk patients improve the safety and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery?

被引:3
|
作者
Kuiper, B. I. [1 ,2 ]
Janssen, L. M. J. [3 ]
Versteeg, K. S. [4 ]
ten Tusscher, B. L. [5 ]
van der Spoel, J. I. [5 ]
Lubbers, W. D. [3 ]
Kazemier, G. [1 ,2 ]
Loer, S. A. [3 ]
Schober, P. [3 ]
van Halm, V. P. [6 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Anesthesiol, Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Internal Med, Sect Geriatr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Intens Care Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Amsterdam UMC Locat VUmc, Dept Cardiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Multidisciplinary team; Preoperative consultation; Anesthesia; Frailty; High-risk surgery; PREHABILITATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-023-02394-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundInternational guidelines recommend preoperative multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment for high-risk surgical patients. Preoperative MDT meetings can help to improve surgical care, but there is little evidence on whether they improve patient outcomes.MethodsThis paper aims to share our experience of MDT meetings for high-risk surgical patients to underline their added value to the current standard of care. An observational study of a retrospective cohort of preoperative high-risk MDT meetings of a tertiary referral hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. For 249 patients the outcomes preoperative data, MDT decisions, and patient outcomes were collected from electronic health records.Main resultsA total of 249 patients were discussed at high-risk MDT meetings. Most of the patients (97%) were assessed as having an American Society of Anesthesiology score >= 3, and 219 (88%) had a European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Anaesthesiology risk score of intermediate or high. After MDT assessment, 154 (62%) were directly approved for surgery, and 39 (16%) were considered ineligible for surgery. The remaining 56 (23%) patients underwent additional assessments before reconsideration at a high-risk MDT meeting. The main reason for patients being discussed at the high-risk MDT meeting was to assess the risk-benefit ratio of surgery. Ultimately, 184 (74%) patients underwent surgery. Of the operated patients, 122 (66%) did not have a major complication in the postoperative period, and 149 patients (81%) were alive after one year.ConclusionsThis cohort study shows the vulnerability and complexity of high-risk patients but also shows that the use of an MDT assessment contributes too improved peri- and postoperative treatment strategies in high-risk patients. Most patients underwent surgery after careful risk assessment and, if deemed necessary, preoperative and perioperative treatment optimization to reduce their risk.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment of high-risk patients improve the safety and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery?
    B. I. Kuiper
    L.M.J. Janssen
    K. S. Versteeg
    B. L. ten Tusscher
    J. I. van der Spoel
    W. D. Lubbers
    G. Kazemier
    S. A. Loer
    P. Schober
    V. P. van Halm
    BMC Anesthesiology, 24
  • [2] Does preoperative intervention program improve postoperative outcome in high-risk patients undergoing thoracic surgery?
    Yung, MW
    CHEST, 2004, 126 (04) : 776S - 776S
  • [3] Does preoperative intervention program improve postoperative outcome in high-risk patients undergoing thoracic surgery?
    Yung, WMM
    Mok, YWT
    Ling, SO
    Poon, YN
    Wong, KC
    Yim, CW
    CHEST, 2005, 128 (04) : 337S - 338S
  • [4] Outcomes of Preoperative weight loss in high-risk patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery
    Still, Christopher D.
    Benotti, Peter
    Wood, G. Craig
    Gerhard, Glenn S.
    Petrick, Anthony
    Reed, Mary
    Strodel, William
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2007, 142 (10) : 994 - 998
  • [5] Does metoprolol prevent adverse outcomes for high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery?
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Yang, H.
    Yusuf, S.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 57 (09): : 573 - 573
  • [6] Preoperative multidisciplinary team decisions for high-risk patients scheduled for noncardiac surgery-a retrospective observational study
    Vernooij, Jacqueline E. M.
    Smulders, Pascal S. H.
    Geurts, Jose W.
    Kalkman, Cor J.
    Koning, Nick J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2021, 68 (12): : 1769 - 1778
  • [7] Multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery
    Tengberg, L. T.
    Bay-Nielsen, M.
    Bisgaard, T.
    Cihoric, M.
    Lauritsen, M. L.
    Foss, N. B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (04) : 463 - 471
  • [8] DOES USE OF A MULTIDISCIPLINARY PROGRESSION TEAM IMPROVE OUTCOMES FOR PATIENTS WITH TRACHEOSTOMIES?
    Godfrey, Mark
    Baker, Katlyn
    Oldach, Sara
    Parson, Edward
    Sharofi, Saimir
    Edwards, Randolph
    Allison, David
    Morascini, Anthony
    Ricaurte, Daniel
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [9] Preoperative multidisciplinary team meetings for high-risk noncardiac surgical patients: a Dutch nationwide survey
    Boerlage, Romijn M.
    Vernooij, Jacqueline E. M.
    Kooi, Arendina W. van der
    Dirksen, Carmen D.
    Kalkman, Cor J.
    Spruit, Rutger J.
    Leeuwen, Barbara L. van
    van der Wal-huisman, Hanneke
    Festen, Suzanne
    Preckel, Benedikt
    Doggen, Carine J. M.
    Koning, Nick J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 133 (04) : 907 - 910
  • [10] CON: Preoperative coronary revascularization in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery
    Garcia, Santiago
    McFalls, Edward O.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (03): : 764 - 766