Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line Treatment Options for Advanced Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Zhao, Luqing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Zhiting [4 ]
Yan, Xiaoqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hu, Xiao [5 ,6 ,8 ]
Feng, Jifeng [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
Yu, Shaorong [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Canc Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Inst Canc Res, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Air Force Hosp Eastern Theater PLA, Dept Oncol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Suqian Peoples Hosp 1, Dept Oncol, Suqian, Peoples R China
[6] Suqian First Hosp, Suqian, Peoples R China
[7] Baiziting 42, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[8] Suzhi Rd 120, Suqian 223800, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
advanced SCLC; chemotherapy; combination; immunotherapy; second-line treatment; single-agent; NIVOLUMAB PLUS IPILIMUMAB; OPEN-LABEL; CHECKMATE; 032; TOPOTECAN; RECURRENT; MULTICENTER; ETOPOSIDE; PEMBROLIZUMAB; CHEMOTHERAPY; CARBOPLATIN;
D O I
10.1177/15330338241227055
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: As monotherapy such as topotecan has reached a plateau of effectiveness, new second-line treatments based on experience have been used in clinical application. This study compared the efficacy and safety of different second-line treatments for advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).Methods: A total of 380 patients with advanced SCLC were screened selectively in the retrospective study. Adverse events and patient responses were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 and Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors v1.1. The progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method or Cox survival regression model and compared using the log-rank test.Results: In the platinum-resistant group, disease control rate (DCR) and median PFS (mPFS) were prolonged in the combination group versus single-agent group (DCR: 49.24% vs 24.39%, P = .004; mPFS: 3.73 vs 1.90 months, P < .001). Grade 3/4 toxicity was similar between the 2 groups (P = .683). The mPFS did not differ among single-agent groups (P = .380). No significant difference was observed in mPFS of different combination therapy groups (P = .170). In terms of platinum-based chemotherapy, the DCR and mPFS were prolonged in irinotecan-platinum group versus taxol-platinum group (DCR: 56.14% vs 9.09%, P = .004; mPFS: 3.87 vs 1.93 months, P = .012). Grade 3/4 toxicity was similar between the 2 groups (P = .614). The mPFS was prolonged in the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy group versus single-agent chemotherapy group (P = .003). In the platinum-sensitive group, the mPFS did not differ between the combination group and single-agent group (P = .200). The mPFS did not differ among different single-agent groups (P = .260) or combination groups (P = .150). There was no difference in mPFS among different platinum-based chemotherapy groups (P = .830).Conclusions: For patients with platinum-resistant SCLC, combination therapy has shown better efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile than monotherapy. Among combination therapies, irinotecan-platinum has shown better efficacy than taxol-platinum. For patients with platinum-sensitive SCLC, the efficacy of different single-agent or combination therapies was similar.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer
    MacCallum C.
    Gillenwater H.H.
    Current Oncology Reports, 2006, 8 (4) : 258 - 264
  • [2] Second-Line Treatment Options for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Light at the End of the Tunnel
    Meriggi, Fausto
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [3] Second-line treatment options in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    de Marinis, Filippo
    Ricciardi, Serena
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S258 - S271
  • [4] The safety of second-line treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer
    Rossi, Antonio
    Maione, Paolo
    Santabarbara, Giuseppe
    Sacco, Paola Claudia
    Casaluce, Francesca
    Sgambato, Assunta
    Barzelloni, Maria Luisa
    Palazzolo, Giovanni
    Gridelli, Cesare
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 16 (04) : 471 - 479
  • [5] Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: First-Line and Second-Line Treatment Options
    Zugazagoitia, Jon
    Paz-Ares, Luis
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (06) : 671 - +
  • [6] Second-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer
    Schmittel, Alexander
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2011, 11 (04) : 631 - 637
  • [7] A Systematic Analysis of Efficacy of Second-Line Chemotherapy in Sensitive and Refractory Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Owonikoko, Taofeek K.
    Behera, Madhusmita
    Chen, Zhengjia
    Bhimani, Chandar
    Curran, Walter J.
    Khuri, Fadlo R.
    Ramalingam, Suresh S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7 (05) : 866 - 872
  • [8] Comparative efficacy and safety of anlotinib and topotecan as second-line treatment in small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Du, Yang
    Liu, Xiao-Yan
    Si, Xiao-Yan
    Zhang, Xiao-Tong
    Zhou, Jing-Ya
    Wang, Yi
    Chen, Min-Jiang
    Zhang, Li
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (07)
  • [9] Second-line treatment options in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Current status
    Cullen, M
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2006, 33 (01) : S3 - S8
  • [10] Optimal drugs for second-line treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer
    Rossi, Antonio
    Sacco, Paola Claudia
    Sgambato, Assunta
    Casaluce, Francesca
    Santabarbara, Giuseppe
    Palazzolo, Giovanni
    Maione, Paolo
    Gridelli, Cesare
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2016, 17 (07) : 969 - 976