Laterality indices consensus initiative (LICI): A Delphi expert survey report on recommendations to record, assess, and report asymmetry in human behavioural and brain research

被引：28

作者：

Vingerhoets, Guy ^{[1
,13
]}

Verhelst, Helena ^{[1
]}

Gerrits, Robin ^{[1
]}

Badcock, Nicholas ^{[2
]}

Bishop, Dorothy V. M. ^{[3
]}

Carey, David ^{[4
]}

Flindall, Jason ^{[5
]}

Grimshaw, Gina ^{[6
]}

Harris, Lauren Julius ^{[7
]}

Hausmann, Markus ^{[8
]}

Hirnstein, Marco ^{[9
]}

Jancke, Lutz ^{[10
]}

Joliot, Marc ^{[11
]}

Specht, Karsten ^{[9
]}

Westerhausen, Rene ^{[12
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Psychol, Ghent, Belgium

[2] Macquarie Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, Ctr Reading, Sydney, NSW, Australia

[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford, England

[4] Bangor Univ, Sch Human & Behav Sci, Bangor, Wales

[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychol, Vancouver, BC, Canada

[6] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Psychol, Wellington, New Zealand

[7] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychol, E Lansing, MI USA

[8] Univ Durham, Dept Psychol, Durham, England

[9] Univ Bergen, Dept Biol & Med Psychol, Bergen, Norway

[10] Univ Zurich, Inst Psychol, Dept Neuropsychol, Zurich, Switzerland

[11] Univ Bordeaux, Grp Imagerie Neurofonctionelle, CEA, Bordeaux, France

[12] Univ Oslo, Dept Psychol, Oslo, Norway

[13] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Psychol, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

来源：

LATERALITY | 2023年 / 28卷 / 2-3期

关键词：

Laterality index; Delphi survey; recommendations; good practices; FUNCTIONAL CEREBRAL ASYMMETRIES; HEMISPHERIC LANGUAGE DOMINANCE; EDINBURGH HANDEDNESS INVENTORY; PRINCIPAL-COMPONENTS-ANALYSIS; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; FRONTAL EEG ASYMMETRY; SURFACE LAPLACIAN; EXPRESS SACCADES; HAND PREFERENCE; PERFORMANCE;

D O I：

10.1080/1357650X.2023.2199963

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Laterality indices (LIs) quantify the left-right asymmetry of brain and behavioural variables and provide a measure that is statistically convenient and seemingly easy to interpret. Substantial variability in how structural and functional asymmetries are recorded, calculated, and reported, however, suggest little agreement on the conditions required for its valid assessment. The present study aimed for consensus on general aspects in this context of laterality research, and more specifically within a particular method or technique (i.e., dichotic listening, visual half-field technique, performance asymmetries, preference bias reports, electrophysiological recording, functional MRI, structural MRI, and functional transcranial Doppler sonography). Experts in laterality research were invited to participate in an online Delphi survey to evaluate consensus and stimulate discussion. In Round 0, 106 experts generated 453 statements on what they considered good practice in their field of expertise. Statements were organised into a 295-statement survey that the experts then were asked, in Round 1, to independently assess for importance and support, which further reduced the survey to 241 statements that were presented again to the experts in Round 2. Based on the Round 2 input, we present a set of critically reviewed key recommendations to record, assess, and report laterality research for various methods.

引用

页码：122 / 191

页数：70