Declining Use of Prone Positioning After High Initial Uptake in COVID-19 Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome

被引:6
|
作者
Hochberg, Chad H. [1 ]
Psoter, Kevin J. [2 ]
Eakin, Michelle N. [1 ]
Hager, David N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
adult respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19; implementation science; intensive care units; prone position; CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019; ARDS;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000005969
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Prone positioning for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has historically been underused, but was widely adopted for COVID-19-associated ARDS early in the pandemic. Whether this successful implementation has been sustained over the first 3 years of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. In this study, we characterized proning use in patients with COVID-19 ARDS from March 2020 to December 2022.DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective observational study.SETTING: Five-hospital health system in Maryland, USA.PATIENTS: Adults with COVID-19 supported with invasive mechanical ventilation and with a P(a)o(2)/Fio(2) ratio of less than or equal to 150 mm Hg while receiving Fio(2) of greater than or equal to 0.6 within 72 hours of intubation.INTERVENTIONS: None.MEASUREMENTS: We extracted demographic, clinical, and positioning data from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the initiation of proning within 48 hours of meeting criteria. We compared proning use by year with univariate and multivariate relative risk (RR) regression. Additionally, we evaluated the association of treatment during a COVID-19 surge period and receipt of prone positioning.MAIN RESULTS: We identified 656 qualifying patients; 341 from 2020, 224 from 2021, and 91 from 2022. More than half (53%) met severe ARDS criteria. Early proning occurred in 56.2% of patients in 2020, 56.7% in 2021, and 27.5% in 2022. This translated to a 51% reduction in use of prone positioning among patients treated in 2022 versus 2020 (RR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33-0.72; p < 0.001). This reduction remained significant in adjusted models (adjusted RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.82; p = 0.002). Treatment during COVID-19 surge periods was associated with a 7% increase in proning use (adjusted RR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13; p = 0.01).CONCLUSIONS: The use of prone positioning for COVID-19 ARDS is declining. Interventions to increase and sustain appropriate use of this evidence-based therapy are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1551
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Prone Positioning Use in COVID-19 Versus Historic Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Hochberg, Chad H.
    Psoter, Kevin J.
    Sahetya, Sarina K.
    Nolley, Eric P.
    Hossen, Shakir
    Checkley, William
    Kerlin, Meeta P.
    Eakin, Michelle N.
    Hager, David N.
    CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2022, 4 (05) : E0695
  • [2] ECMO combined with prone positioning strategies in COVID-19 respiratory distress syndrome
    Xu, Yue
    Chou, Yueh-ting
    Wei, Xin-guang
    Zhang, Shan-feng
    Jiang, Feng
    Liu, Yan
    PERFUSION-UK, 2022, 37 (04): : 417 - 421
  • [3] Physiological Changes During Prone Positioning in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Lee, Rui Min
    Tan, Geak Poh
    Puah, Ser Hon
    Ling, Li Min
    Choy, Chiaw Yee
    Chotirmall, Sanjay H.
    Abisheganaden, John
    See, Jee Jian
    Tan, Hui Ling
    Wong, Yu-Lin
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2020, 49 (07) : 509 - 513
  • [4] Early Physiologic Effects of Prone Positioning in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Zarantonello, Francesco
    Sella, Nicolo
    Pettenuzzo, Tommaso
    Andreatta, Giulio
    Calore, Alvise
    Dotto, Denise
    De Cassai, Alessandro
    Calabrese, Fiorella
    Boscolo, Annalisa
    Navalesi, Paolo
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 137 (03) : 327 - 339
  • [5] Sustainment of Prone Positioning in ICU Practice for COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
    Hochberg, C. H.
    Psoter, K.
    Case, A. S.
    Eakin, M.
    Hager, D. N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207
  • [6] Prone positioning in Covid-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and invasive mechanical ventilation
    Barja-Martinez, E.
    Garcia-Gonzalez, S.
    Jimenez-Garcia, E.
    Thuissard-Vasallo, I. J.
    Arias-Rivera, S.
    Blanco-Abril, S.
    ENFERMERIA INTENSIVA, 2023, 34 (02): : 80 - 89
  • [7] Incidence and Determinants of Acute Kidney Injury after Prone Positioning in Severe COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    La Rosa, Riccardo
    Grechi, Benedetta
    Ragazzi, Riccardo
    Alvisi, Valentina
    Montanari, Giacomo
    Marangoni, Elisabetta
    Volta, Carlo Alberto
    Spadaro, Savino
    Scaramuzzo, Gaetano
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (21)
  • [8] Prone Positioning of Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Related to COVID-19: A Rehabilitation-Based Prone Team
    Ng, Jillian A.
    Miccile, Lauren A.
    Iracheta, Christine
    Berndt, Carolyn
    Detwiller, Meredith
    Yuse, Carolyn
    Tolland, Joseph
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2020, 100 (10): : 1737 - 1745
  • [9] Adaptations and Uncertainties: Clinicians' Experiences With Prone Positioning for COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
    Hochberg, C. H.
    Card, M.
    Seth, B.
    Hager, D. N.
    Eakin, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207
  • [10] A case of meralgia paresthetica caused by prone positioning in a COVID-19 patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Karaaslan, Tahsin
    Avarisli, Aysenur
    Durdu, Bulent
    Daskaya, Hayrettin
    EMERGENCY CARE JOURNAL, 2022, 18 (01)