Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis - A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study)

被引:0
|
作者
Mariappan, Ramamani [1 ]
Kumar, Snehil [2 ]
Raju, Krishnaprabhu [3 ]
Daniel, Dolly [2 ]
Nair, Sukesh Chandran [2 ]
Subramani, Sathya [4 ]
机构
[1] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Neuroanaesthesia, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Transfus Med & Immunohaematol, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Nerurol Sci, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Physiol, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Blood coagulation; epidural blood patch; cerebrospinal fluid leak; clot retraction; haemolysis; intracranial hypotension;
D O I
10.4103/ija.ija_849_22
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Epidural blood patch (EBP) is performed by injecting autologous blood into the epidural space using a Tuohy needle. Certain clinical scenarios mandate an epidural catheter (EC)-assisted EBP. Collecting blood in a 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe appears to influence the quality of the clot. This in vitro study compared the techniques of performing the EC-assisted EBP using 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe on clotting time (CT), clot retraction (CR) and haemolysis. Methods: This in vitro study was performed in a haematology laboratory. Five consented adult healthy male volunteers donated blood. In the 5-ml syringe technique, blood was injected through an EC, and as it flowed out of the tip, it was collected at the beginning and the end of 1 min. With the 20-ml technique, blood was collected at the beginning and end of the first, second and third minute. The samples were tested for CT, CR and haemolysis by measuring the plasma-free haemoglobin (PFHb). Results: Five injections were made using a 5-ml syringe, and another five with a 20-ml syringe. Injection time was shorter in the 5-ml technique (80.80 +/- 5.89 vs. 272 +/- 28.4 s, P < 0.0001). With the 20-ml technique, CT progressively increased (>15 min), whereas, with the 5-ml syringe, the CT was normal. Both techniques caused mild, insignificant haemolysis (PFHb >0.005 g/dl), without affecting the quality of CR. Conclusion: EC-assisted EBP using a 5-ml syringe technique shortens the injection time and deposits fresh blood quickly without affecting CT and CR.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 547
页数:4
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据