The AO classification system for tibial plateau fractures: An independent inter and intraobserver agreement study

被引:0
|
作者
Besa, Pablo [1 ]
Angulo, Manuela [2 ]
Vial, Raimundo [1 ]
Vega, Rafael [1 ]
Irribarra, Luis [1 ]
Lobos, Daniel [1 ]
Sandoval, Felipe [1 ]
Irarrazaval, Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Orthoped Surg, Diagonal Paraguay 362,Acad Bldg,3rd Floor, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Rosario, Sch Med, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
Tibial plateau fracture; Classification; Agreement study; Reliability; X-ray; SCHATZKER; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.028
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Classifying tibial plateau fractures is paramount in determining treatment regimens and systemizing decision making. The original AO classification described by Muller in 1996 and the Schatzker classification of 1970 are the most cited classifications for tibial plateau fractures, demonstrating substantial to almost perfect agreement. The main problem with these classifications schemes is that they lack the detail required to convey the variety of fracture patterns encountered. In 2018, the AO foundation published a new classification system for proximal tibia fractures, highlighting a more complete and detailed number of categories and subcategories. We sought to independently determine inter and intraobserver agreement of the AO classification system, compared to the previous systems described by Muller and Schatzker. Methods: One hundred seven consecutive tibial plateau fractures were screened, and a representative data set of 69 was created. Six independent evaluators (three knee surgeons, three senior orthopedic residents) classified the fractures using the original AO, the Schatzker and the new AO classifications. After six weeks, the 69 cases were randomized and reclassified by all evaluators. The Kappa coefficient (k) was calculated for inter- and intraobserver correlation and is expressed with 95% confidence intervals. Results: interobserver agreement was moderate for all three classifications. k = 0.464 (0.383-0.560) for the original AO; k = 0.404 (0.337-0.489) for Schatzker; and k = 0.457 (0.371-0.545) for the base categories of the new AO classification. The inclusion of subcategories and letter modifiers to the new classification worsened agreement to k = 0.358 (0.302-0.423) and k = 0.174 (0.134-0.222), respectively. There were no significant differences between knee surgeons and residents for the new classification. Intra-observer correlation was also moderate for each of the scores: k = 0.630 (0.578-0.682) for the original AO; k = 0.623 (0.569-0.674) for Schatzker; and k = 0.621 (0.566-0.678) for the new AO base categories; without differences between knee surgeons or residents. Conclusions: This study demonstrated an adequate inter and intra-observer agreement for the new AO tibial plateau fractures classification system for its base categories, but not at the subcategory or letter modifier levels.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AO or Schatzker? How reliable is classification of tibial plateau fractures?
    N. P. Walton
    S. Harish
    C. Roberts
    C. Blundell
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2003, 123 : 396 - 398
  • [2] AO or Schatzker? How reliable is classification of tibial plateau fractures?
    Walton, NP
    Harish, S
    Roberts, C
    Blundell, C
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2003, 123 (08) : 396 - 398
  • [3] An independent inter- and intraobserver agreement assessment of the AOSpine sacral fracture classification system
    Urrutia, Julio
    Meissner-Haecker, Arturo
    Astur, Nelson
    Valencia, Manuel
    Yurac, Ratko
    Camino-Willhuber, Gaston
    Valacco, Marcelo
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (07): : 1143 - 1148
  • [4] Inter- and intraobserver agreement on the Load Sharing Classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures
    Elzinga, Matthijs
    Segers, Michiel
    Siebenga, Jan
    Heilbron, Emile
    de lange-de Klerk, E. S. M.
    Bakker, Fred
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2012, 43 (04): : 416 - 422
  • [5] Inter- and intra-observer variation of the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications of tibial plateau fractures and a proposal of a new classification system
    Charalambous, C. P.
    Tryfonidis, M.
    Alvi, F.
    Moran, M.
    Fang, C.
    Samaraji, R.
    Hirst, P.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2007, 89 (04) : 400 - 404
  • [6] An Independent Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement Evaluation of the AOSpine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System
    Urrutia, Julio
    Zamora, Tomas
    Yurac, Ratko
    Campos, Mauricio
    Palma, Joaquin
    Mobarec, Sebastian
    Prada, Carlos
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (05) : 298 - 303
  • [7] A New Classification System for Pilon Fractures Based on CT Scan: An Independent Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement Evaluation
    Palma, Joaquin
    Villa, Andres
    Mery, Pablo
    Abarca, Mario
    Mora, Andres
    Pena, Andres
    Urrutia, Julio
    Filippi, Jorge
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (05) : 208 - 213
  • [8] The new AO classification system for intertrochanteric fractures allows better agreement than the original AO classification. An inter- and intra-observer agreement evaluation
    Klaber, Ianiv
    Besa, Pablo
    Sandoval, Felipe
    Lobos, Daniel
    Zamora, Tomas
    Schweitzer, Daniel
    Urrutia, Julio
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2021, 52 (01): : 102 - 105
  • [9] Medial tibial plateau fractures: a now classification system
    Wahlquist, Marc
    Iaguilli, Nick
    Ebraheim, Nabil
    Levine, Jason
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 63 (06): : 1418 - 1421
  • [10] Tibial plateau fractures: Reproducibility of three classifications (Schatzker, AO, Duparc) and a revised Duparc classification
    Gicquel, T.
    Najihi, N.
    Vendeuvre, T.
    Teyssedou, S.
    Gayet, L. -E.
    Huten, D.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2013, 99 (07) : 805 - 816