Clinical impact of influenza vaccination after ST- and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction- from the IAMI trial

被引:8
|
作者
Froebert, Ole [1 ,28 ]
Goetberg, Matthias [2 ]
Erlinge, David [2 ]
Akhtar, Zubair [3 ,5 ]
Christiansen, Evald H. [4 ]
MacIntyre, Chandini R. [5 ]
Oldroyd, Keith G. [6 ,7 ]
Motovska, Zuzana [8 ,9 ]
Erglis, Andrejs [10 ]
Moer, Rasmus [11 ]
Hlinomaz, Ota [12 ]
Jakobsen, Lars [4 ]
Engstrom, Thomas [13 ]
Jensen, Lisette O. [14 ]
Fallesen, Christian O. [14 ]
Jensen, Svend E. [15 ,16 ]
Angeras, Oskar [17 ,18 ]
Calais, Fredrik [1 ]
Karegren, Amra [19 ]
Lauermann, Joerg [20 ]
Mokhtari, Arash [2 ]
Nilsson, Johan [21 ]
Persson, Jonas [22 ]
Stalby, Per [23 ]
Islam, Abu K. M. M. [24 ]
Rahman, Afzalur [24 ]
Malik, Fazila [25 ]
Choudhury, Sohel [25 ]
Collier, Timothy [26 ]
Pocock, Stuart J. [26 ]
Pernow, John [27 ]
机构
[1] Orebro Univ, Fac Hlth, Dept Cardiol, Orebro, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Clin Sci, Lund, Sweden
[3] Int Ctr Diarrhoeal Dis Res, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Univ New South Wales, Kirby Inst, UNSW Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Glasgow, Inst Cardiovasc & Med Sci, Glasgow, Scotland
[7] Golden Jubilee Natl Hosp, West Scotland Heart & Lung Ctr, Clyde bank, Glasgow, Scotland
[8] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 3, Cardioctr, Prague, Czech Republic
[9] Univ Hosp Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
[10] Univ Latvia, Pauls Stradins Clin Univ Hosp, Riga, Latvia
[11] LHL sykehuset Gardermoen, Oslo, Norway
[12] Masaryk Univ, St Anne Univ Hosp, Int Clin Res Ctr, Brno, Czech Republic
[13] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[14] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Odense, Denmark
[15] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Aalborg, Denmark
[16] Aalborg Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg, Denmark
[17] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[18] Gothenburg Univ, Inst Med, Dept Mol & Clin Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
[19] Vastmanlands sjukhus Vasteras, Vasteras, Sweden
[20] Linkoping Univ, Dept Cardiol, Dept Hlth Med & Caring, Linkoping, Sweden
[21] Umea Univ, Heart Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Cardiol, Umea, Sweden
[22] Karolinska Inst, Danderyd Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Sci, Div Cardiovasc Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[23] Karlstad Cent Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Karlstad, Sweden
[24] Natl Inst Cardiovasc Dis, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[25] Natl Heart Fdn Hosp & Res Inst, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[26] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Med Stat, London, England
[27] Karolinska Inst, Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Med Solna, Cardiol Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
[28] Orebro Univ, Fac Hlth, Dept Cardiol, Sodra Grev Rosengatan, S-70185 Orebro, Sweden
关键词
ISCHEMIC EVENTS; HEART-DISEASE; HOSPITALIZATION; PREVENTION; EFFICACY; PATTERNS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2022.10.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Influenza vaccination early after myocardial infarction (MI) improves prognosis but vaccine effectiveness may differ dependent on type of MI. Methods A total of 2,571 participants were prospectively enrolled in the Influenza vaccination after myocardial infarction (IAMI) trial and randomly assigned to receive in-hospital inactivated influenza vaccine or saline placebo. The trial was conducted at 30 centers in eight countries from October 1, 2016 to March 1, 2020. Here we report vaccine effective-ness in the 2,467 participants with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI, n = 1,348) or non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI, n = 1,119). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, MI, or stent thrombosis at 12 months. Cumulative incidence of the primary and key secondary endpoints by randomized treatment and NSTEMI/STEMI was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment effects were evaluated with formal interaction testing to assess for effect modification. Results Baseline risk was higher in participants with NSTEMI. In the NSTEMI group the primary endpoint occurred in 6.5% of participants assigned to influenza vaccine and 10.5% assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91), compared to 4.1% assigned to influenza vaccine and 4.5% assigned to placebo in the STEMI group (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.54-1.50, P = .237 for interaction). Similar findings were seen for the key secondary endpoints of all-cause death and cardiovascular death. The Kaplan-Meier risk difference in all-cause death at one year was more pronounced in participants with NSTEMI (NSTEMI: HR, 0.47; 95% CI 0.28-0.80, STEMI: HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.43-1.70, interaction P = .028). Conclusions The beneficial effect of influenza vaccination on adverse cardiovascular events may be enhanced in patients with NSTEMI compared to those with STEMI.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 89
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is The Diagnosis ST-Segment Elevation or Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
    Tsutsumi, Katsuhiko
    Tsukahara, Kengo
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138 (23) : 2715 - 2717
  • [2] Guideline Adherence After ST-Segment Elevation Versus Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Somma, Keith A.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    Cannon, Christopher P.
    Cox, Margueritte
    Laskey, Warren
    Peacock, W. Frank
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Schwamm, Lee
    Saxon, Leslie A.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2012, 5 (05): : 654 - 661
  • [3] Management of non-ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Van Horn, Stephen E.
    Maniu, Calin V.
    MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 91 (04) : 683 - +
  • [4] Clinical Analysis of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Huang Zhaohe
    Liang Limei
    Pan Xingshou
    Lan Jingsheng
    He Jinlong
    Liu Yan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF MODERN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2013, 191 : 639 - +
  • [5] THE PLATELET PHENOTYPE IN PATIENTS WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IS DIFFERENT FROM NON-ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    Cameron, Scott J.
    Schmidt, Rachel A.
    Simlote, Preya
    Ling, Fred
    Fernandez, Genaro
    Gervase, Joe
    Adler, David
    Morrell, Craig
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 66 (04) : 785 - 786
  • [6] The platelet phenotype in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is different from non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Schmidt, Rachel A.
    Morrell, Craig N.
    Ling, Frederick S.
    Simlote, Preya
    Fernandez, Genaro
    Rich, David Q.
    Adler, David
    Gervase, Joe
    Cameron, Scott J.
    TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 195 : 1 - 12
  • [7] Myocardial infarction: when ST-segment elevation versus non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction paradigm fails
    Terlecki, Michal
    Rajzer, Marek
    Czarnecka, Danuta
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2019, 77 (03) : 396 - 396
  • [8] Clinical impact of immediate invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Sim, Doo Sun
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Kim, Young Jo
    Chae, Shung Chull
    Hong, Taek Jong
    Seong, In Whan
    Chae, Jei Keon
    Kim, Chong Jin
    Cho, Myeong Chan
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Bae, Jang Ho
    Seung, Ki Bae
    Park, Seung Jung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 221 : 937 - 943
  • [9] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Non-ST-Segment and ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Populations
    Kim, Yong Hoon
    Her, Ae-Young
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Choi, Cheol Ung
    Choi, Byoung Geol
    Kim, Ji Bak
    Park, Soohyung
    Kang, Dong Oh
    Park, Ji Young
    Park, Sang-Ho
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (17)
  • [10] The impact of obesity on mortality in UA/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Buettner, Heinz J.
    Mueller, Christian
    Gick, Michael
    Ferenc, Marek
    AlIgeier, Juergen
    Comberg, Thomas
    Werner, Klaus D.
    Schindler, Christian
    Neumann, Franz-Josef
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (14) : 1694 - 1701