Narrative medicine interventions for oncology clinicians: a systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Paul, Trisha K. [1 ]
Reddy, Yashaswi [2 ]
Gnanakumar, Anthara [3 ]
England, Rebecca [4 ]
Superdock, Alexandra [1 ]
Malipeddi, Dhatri [5 ]
Wrigley, Jordan [1 ]
Reardon, Erin [6 ]
Weaver, Meaghann S. [7 ]
Kaye, Erica C. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Oncol, Div Qual Life & Palliat Care, 262 Danny Thomas Pl,Mail Stop 260, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[2] Kakatiya Med Coll, Warangal, Telangana, India
[3] George Washington Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN USA
[5] Rochester Gen Hosp, Rochester, NY USA
[6] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
Narrative medicine; Cancer; Oncology; Clinicians; Storytelling; Reflection; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-024-08434-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeAs narrative medicine interventions are integrated increasingly into medical practice, growing evidence indicates benefits for healthcare professionals. Presently, the prevalence and impact of narrative medicine interventions in the field of oncology remain unknown. This systematic review synthesizes published data on narrative medicine interventions in oncology and reports current knowledge on feasibility, acceptability, and impact on cancer care professionals.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception through February 2024. Eligible articles were published in English and contained original data on feasibility, acceptability, and/or impact of a narrative medicine intervention for oncology professionals. Database searches identified 2614 deduplicated articles, from which 50 articles were identified for full-text assessment and 11 articles met inclusion criteria. Two additional articles were identified through manual review of references.ResultsThirteen articles described 12 unique narrative medicine interventions targeting cancer care professionals. All studies described their respective interventions as feasible, acceptable, and impactful for participants. Interventions involved writing, reading, reflection, and other narrative-based strategies. Standardized validated tools evaluated outcomes including burnout, empathy expression, secondary trauma, quality of humanistic care, and well-being. Participants reported appreciation of opportunities for reflection, perspective sharing, and bearing witness, which they perceived to strengthen wellness and community.ConclusionNarrative medicine interventions are feasible and acceptable and may bolster oncology clinicians' functioning across domains. Multi-site, prospective, randomized studies are needed to investigate the broader impact of narrative medicine interventions and advance the science of narrative medicine in oncology.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: CRD42022369432
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Narrative medicine interventions for oncology clinicians: a systematic review
    Trisha K. Paul
    Yashaswi Reddy
    Anthara Gnanakumar
    Rebecca England
    Alexandra Superdock
    Dhatri Malipeddi
    Jordan Wrigley
    Erin Reardon
    Meaghann S. Weaver
    Erica C. Kaye
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024, 32
  • [2] Burnout in psychosocial oncology clinicians: A systematic review
    Morris, Sue E.
    Tarquini, Sarah J.
    Yusufov, Miryam
    Adolf, Esmeralda
    Amonoo, Hermioni L.
    Bain, Paul A.
    Borstelmann, Nancy A.
    Braun, Ilana M.
    Hughes, Tricia
    Muriel, Anna C.
    Northman, Lisa M.
    Peteet, John R.
    Poort, Hanneke
    Russ-Carbin, Angelee
    Pirl, William F.
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2021, 19 (02) : 223 - 234
  • [3] Communication Interventions Targeting Both Patients and Clinicians in Oncology: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Mcdarby, Meghan
    Mroz, Emily
    Walsh, Leah E.
    Malling, Charlotte
    Chilov, Marina
    Rosa, William E.
    Kastrinos, Amanda
    Mcconnell, Kelly M.
    Parker, Patricia A.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2025, 34 (03)
  • [4] Monkeypox: A focused narrative review for emergency medicine clinicians
    Long, Brit
    Koyfman, Alex
    Gottlieb, Michael
    Liang, Stephen Y.
    Carius, Brandon M.
    Chavez, Summer
    Brady, William J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 61 : 34 - 43
  • [5] RCVS: by clinicians for clinicians—a narrative review
    Deborah Katharina Erhart
    Albert Christian Ludolph
    Katharina Althaus
    Journal of Neurology, 2023, 270 : 673 - 688
  • [6] Quality Improvement in Gastroenterology: A Systematic Review of Practical Interventions for Clinicians
    Courtney Reynolds
    Eric Esrailian
    Daniel Hommes
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2018, 63 : 2507 - 2518
  • [7] A combination of systematic review and clinicians' beliefs in interventions for subacromial pain
    Johansson, K
    Öberg, B
    Adolfsson, L
    Foldevi, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2002, 52 (475): : 145 - 152
  • [8] Quality Improvement in Gastroenterology: A Systematic Review of Practical Interventions for Clinicians
    Reynolds, Courtney
    Esrailian, Eric
    Hommes, Daniel
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2018, 63 (10) : 2507 - 2518
  • [9] Clinical exercise interventions in pediatric oncology: a systematic review
    Freerk T. Baumann
    Wilhelm Bloch
    Julia Beulertz
    Pediatric Research, 2013, 74 : 366 - 374
  • [10] Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in Pediatric Oncology: A Systematic Review
    Muratore, Edoardo
    Baccelli, Francesco
    Leardini, Davide
    Campoli, Caterina
    Belotti, Tamara
    Viale, Pierluigi
    Prete, Arcangelo
    Pession, Andrea
    Masetti, Riccardo
    Zama, Daniele
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (15)