Induction of labor versus expectant management in patients with idiopathic polyhydramnios

被引:0
|
作者
Schoen, Corina N. [1 ,8 ]
Backley, Sami [2 ]
Orr, Lauren [3 ]
Roy, Amrita [4 ]
Corlin, Tiffany [5 ]
Knee, Alexander B. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] UMASS Chan Med Sch Baystate, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Springfield, MA 01199 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reproduct Sci, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Houston, TX USA
[3] WellSpan Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, York, PA 17403 USA
[4] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[6] UMass Chan Med Sch Baystate, Dept Med, Springfield, MA USA
[7] Baystate Med Ctr, Off Res Epidemiol Biostat Res Core, Springfield, MA 01199 USA
[8] UMASS Chan Med Sch Baystate, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Springfield, MA 01199 USA
关键词
Induction; Labor; Polyhydramnios; Cesarean section; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.11.031
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate whether induction of labor is associated with lower risk of cesarean section compared to expectant management in patients with isolated polyhydramnios.Study Design: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with pregnancies complicated by idiopathic polyhydramnios, documented between 34 and 38 weeks gestation, who were delivered between July 2012 and February 2020. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included chorioamnionitis, endometritis, postpartum hemorrhage, preeclampsia/gestational hypertension, and composite neonatal morbidity.Results: There were 194 patients included with idiopathic polyhydramnios - 115 underwent induction and 79 patients were expectantly managed. Planned induction was associated with a lower rate of CD compared with expectant management but did not meet statistical significance (19.1 % vs 30.4 %, aOR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.24, 1.05). A similar effect was seen when stratifying for parity: both nulliparous (9.1 % vs 16.3 %, aOR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.17, 1.98) and multiparous (32.7 % vs 47.2 %, aOR 0.45, 95 % CI 0.18, 1.15) patients had a lower CD rate when there was a planned induction, though neither group met statistical significance. No differences in maternal or fetal secondary outcomes were identified (chorioamnionitis, endometritis, postpartum hemorrhage, preeclampsia/ gestational hypertension, composite neonatal morbidity).Conclusion: Lower rates of cesarean section were associated with labor induction for patients with isolated polyhydramnios, but confidence intervals did not reach statistical significance.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 186
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management in Patients With Non-anomalous Idiopathic Polyhydramnios
    Backley, Sami
    Orr, Lauren
    Knee, Alexander
    Schoen, Corina
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 55S - 55S
  • [2] Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: A randomized study
    Gonen, O
    Rosen, DJD
    Dolfin, Z
    Tepper, R
    Markov, S
    Fejgin, MD
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (06): : 913 - 917
  • [3] INDUCTION OF LABOR VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT - DOES IT MATTER - REPLY
    NATALE, R
    MILNE, K
    CAMPBELL, K
    POTTS, P
    WEBSTER, K
    HALINDA, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (01) : 352 - 353
  • [4] Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management
    Grobman, William A.
    Sandoval, Grecio
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Mallett, Gail
    Hill, Kim
    Rice, Madeline Murguia
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Saade, George R.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Iams, Jay D.
    Chien, Edward K.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Gibbs, Ronald S.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Swamy, Geeta K.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Macones, George A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (04)
  • [5] Macrosomia: Expectant management versus labor induction: A meta-analysis
    Sanchez-Ramos, L
    Bernstein, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S110 - S110
  • [6] Outcomes of induction of labor after prior cesarean versus expectant management
    Palatnik, Anna
    Grobman, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S26 - S26
  • [7] Systematic Review: Elective Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management of Pregnancy
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Sundaram, Vandana
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Gienger, Allison
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    McDonald, Kathryn M.
    Shaffer, Brian L.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Bravata, Dena M.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (04) : 252 - W63
  • [8] Induction of labor versus expectant management for gestational diabetes mellitus at term
    Vitner, Dana
    Hiersch, Liran
    Ashwal, Eran
    Shmueli, Anat
    Yogev, Yariv
    Aviram, Amir
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 300 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [9] Induction of labor versus expectant management for gestational diabetes mellitus at term
    Dana Vitner
    Liran Hiersch
    Eran Ashwal
    Anat Shmueli
    Yariv Yogev
    Amir Aviram
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019, 300 : 79 - 86
  • [10] Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy
    Suzuki, S
    Otsubo, Y
    Sawa, R
    Yoneyama, Y
    Araki, T
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2000, 49 (01) : 24 - 27