A content analysis of the European food safety Authority?s scientific opinion on authorised and rejected appetite-related health claim applications

被引:0
|
作者
Yakubu, Adedamola H. [1 ]
Platts, Katharine [2 ]
Sorsby, Anna C. [1 ]
Clegg, Miriam E. [3 ]
Paxman, Jenny R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Food & Nutr Grp, Howard St, Sheffield S1 1WB, England
[2] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Adv Wellbeing Res Ctr, Sheffield S9 3TU, England
[3] Univ Reading, Inst Food Nutr & Hlth, Dept Food & Nutr Sci, Reading RG6 6DZ, England
关键词
Appetite; Health claim; UK Nutrition and Health Claims Committee; (UKNHCC); Satiety; Satiation; Content analysis; FUNCTIONAL FOODS; ARTICLE 13(1); SATIETY; SUBSTANTIATION; NO; MAINTENANCE; NUTRITION; NUTRIENTS; PURSUANT; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jff.2023.105471
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
From 2006 to 2020, UK nutrition and health claims were assessed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) under EU Nutrition and Health Claims Regulations (2006). Since Brexit, UK applications are considered by the UK Nutrition and Health Claims Committee (UKNHCC).EFSA guidance documentation drawing together claims related to appetite ratings, weight management, and blood glucose concentrations was most recently published in 2012. 61 EFSA scientific opinions on appetiterelated health claims applications from 2010 to 2020 were reviewed. Fifty-five related to hunger, fullness, energy intake, satiation and satiety were rejected, whereas three weight management claims and three blood glucose levels claims were authorised. 17 novel categories of reasons for claims application rejection were synthesised via Inductive Content Analysis (7 main-, 10 sub-categories). The resultant conceptual framework presented herein aims to support commercial pre-assessment of future appetite-related health claim applications and stimulate discussion regarding appetite-related health claims legislation in the new era of UKNHCC.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条