Retromuscular drain versus no drain in robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative

Background Drains may be placed during robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair (rVHR) to decrease wound morbidity, but their use is controversial. We aimed to assess the impact of retromuscular drain placement on wound morbidity after robotic rVHR. Methods Patients with and without drains after robotic rVHR in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry were compared using a propensity score-matched analysis. Outcomes included surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infections (SSI), and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions (SSOPI) at 30 days. Results Propensity score matching compared 580 patients with drains to 580 without drains. The groups were well matched with respect to hernia width (drain: 8.0 cm [IQR 6.0; 10.0] vs no drain: 8.0 cm [IQR 5.0; 10.0]; P = 0.399) and transversus abdominis release (drain: 409 (70.5%) vs no drain: 408 (70.3%); P = 0.949). At 30 days, patients with drains had fewer seromas than those without drains (22 (3.8%) vs 88 (15.2%); P < 0.0001). Rates of SSIs and SSOPIs were similar between the two groups at 30 days. Logistic regression analysis showed drain placement lowered the risk of an SSO compared to no drain placement (OR 0.32, CI 0.21-0.47; P < 0.0001). Hospital stay was longer for patients with drains than those without drains (2.0 days [IQR 1.0; 3.0] vs 1.0 day [IQR 1.0; 2.0], respectively; P < .0001). Conclusion Drain placement during robotic rVHR is associated with decreased postoperative seroma occurrence.