Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Persons Aged 15-64 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Martins, Joao Paulo [1 ,2 ]
Santos, Marlene [1 ,3 ]
Martins, Andre [3 ]
Felgueiras, Miguel [2 ,4 ]
Santos, Rui [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Politecn Porto, Escola Super Saude, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino Almeida, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, CEAUL Ctr Estat & Aplicacoes, Campo Grande, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Inst Politecn Porto, Ctr Invest Saude & Ambiente, Rua Dr Antonio Bernardino Almeida, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[4] Inst Politecn Leiria, Escola Super Tecnol & Gestao, Campus 2,Morro Do Lena Alto Do Vieiro,Apartado 416, P-2411901 Leiria, Portugal
关键词
influenza; test-negative design; clinical trials; efficacy; effectiveness; strains; TEST-NEGATIVE DESIGN; LABORATORY-CONFIRMED INFLUENZA; SOUTH-AFRICA; PRIMARY-CARE; OUTPATIENT SETTINGS; ANTIGENIC MATCH; UNITED-STATES; EFFICACY; ADULTS; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.3390/vaccines11081322
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Influenza is a respiratory disease caused by the influenza virus, which is highly transmissible in humans. This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and test-negative designs (TNDs) to assess the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of seasonal influenza vaccines (SIVs) in humans aged 15 to 64 years. An electronic search to identify all relevant studies was performed. The outcome measure of interest was VE on laboratory-confirmed influenza (any strain). Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and the ROBINS-I tool for TNDs. The search identified a total of 2993 records, but only 123 studies from 73 papers were included in the meta-analysis. Of these studies, 9 were RCTs and 116 were TNDs. The pooled VE was 48% (95% CI: 42-54) for RCTs, 55.4% (95% CI: 43.2-64.9) when there was a match between the vaccine and most prevalent circulating strains and 39.3% (95% CI: 23.5-51.9) otherwise. The TNDs' adjusted VE was equal to 39.9% (95% CI: 31-48), 45.1 (95% CI: 38.7-50.8) when there was a match and 35.1 (95% CI: 29.0-40.7) otherwise. The match between strains included in the vaccine and strains in circulation is the most important factor in the VE. It increases by more than 25% when there is a match with the most prevalent circulating strains. The laboratorial method for confirmation of influenza is a possible source of bias when estimating VE.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A meta-analysis of effectiveness of influenza vaccine in persons aged 65 years and over living in the community
    Vu, T
    Farish, S
    Jenkins, M
    Kelly, H
    VACCINE, 2002, 20 (13-14) : 1831 - 1836
  • [2] Decline in Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness With Vaccination Program Maturation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Okoli, George N.
    Racovitan, Florentin
    Abdulwahid, Tiba
    Hyder, Syed K.
    Lansbury, Louise
    Righolt, Christiaan H.
    Mahmud, Salaheddin M.
    Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S.
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 8 (03):
  • [3] Effectiveness of Cell-Based Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Coleman, Brenda L.
    Gutmanis, Iris
    Mcgovern, Ian
    Haag, Mendel
    VACCINES, 2023, 11 (10)
  • [4] Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccines in children - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luksic, Ivana
    Clay, Sarah
    Falconer, Rachel
    Pulanic, Drazen
    Rudan, Igor
    Campbell, Harry
    Nair, Harish
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (02) : 135 - 145
  • [5] Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Xiaokun
    Zhao, Hongting
    Li, Zhili
    Zhu, Aiqin
    Ren, Minrui
    Geng, Mengjie
    Li, Yu
    Qin, Ying
    Feng, Luzhao
    Peng, Zhibin
    An, Zhijie
    Zheng, Jiandong
    Li, Zhongjie
    Feng, Zijian
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (02) : 1 - 13
  • [6] Effectiveness of MF59-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Domnich, Alexander
    Arata, Lucia
    Amicizia, Daniela
    Puig-Barbera, Joan
    Gasparini, Roberto
    Panatto, Donatella
    VACCINE, 2017, 35 (04) : 513 - 520
  • [7] Intraseasonal waning immunity of seasonal influenza vaccine - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Doyon-Plourde, Pamela
    Przepiorkowski, Joanna
    Young, Kelsey
    Zhao, Linlu
    Sinilaite, Angela
    VACCINE, 2023, 41 (31) : 4462 - 4471
  • [8] Trivalent and quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine in adults aged 60 and older: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
    Thirugnanasampanthar, Sai Surabi
    Konstantinidis, Menelaos
    Dourka, Jasmeen
    Ghassemi, Marco
    Neupane, Dipika
    Khan, Paul
    Nincic, Vera
    Corry, Margarita
    Robson, Reid
    Parker, Amanda
    Soobiah, Charlene
    Sinilaite, Angela
    Doyon-Plourde, Pamela
    Gil, Anabel
    Siu, Winnie
    Moqueet, Nasheed
    Stevens, Adrienne
    English, Kelly
    Florez, Ivan D.
    Yepes-Nunez, Juan J.
    Hutton, Brian
    Muller, Matthew
    Moja, Lorenzo
    Straus, Sharon
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (04) : 239 - 254
  • [9] Effectiveness of the MF59-adjuvanted trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine among adults aged 65 or older; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kennedy, Alex
    Sanderson, Ruth
    McGovern, Ian
    Haag, Mendel
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2021, 40 : 67 - 68
  • [10] Variations in seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies
    Okoli, George N.
    Racovitan, Florentin
    Righolt, Christiaan H.
    Mahmud, Salaheddin M.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 28 : 449 - 449