Treatment safety of ART cycles with extremely high oestradiol concentrations using GnRH agonist trigger

被引:0
|
作者
Youngster, Michal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kedem, Alon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Avraham, Sarit [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yerushalmi, Gil [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baum, Micha [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Maman, Ettie [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hourvitz, Ariel [1 ,2 ]
Gat, Itai [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shamir Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IVF Unit, Zerifin, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Herzliya Med Ctr, IVF Unit, Herzliyya, Israel
[4] Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IVF Unit, Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
Complications; Estradiol; GnRH agonist; IVF; Oocytes; OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION SYNDROME; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; IVF TREATMENT; STIMULATION; ANTAGONIST; OOCYTE; TORSION; RATES; PREGNANCIES; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.11.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Research question: Are IVF treatments with extremely high peak oestradiol levels and gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger associated with higher complication rates? Design: A retrospective cohort study including patients from two large medical centres treated between 2019 and 2021. A study group with extremely high peak oestradiol levels (>= 20,000 pmol/l on the day of ovarian stimulation, or >= 15,000 pmol/l on the previous day) and a control group with normal range oestradiol levels (3000-12000 pmol/l) that received GnRH agonist triggering. Patients were surveyed about complaints and medical care related to ovum retrieval and medical files were reviewed. Major complication rates and the need for medical assistance were compared. Results: Several differences between the study and control group were observed because of thestudy design: mean age was 33.01 +/- 5.14 versus 34.57 +/- 4.52 (P < 0.001), mean peak oestradiol levels was 26645.34 +/- 8592.57 pmol/l versus 7229.75 +/- 2329.20 pmol/l (P < 0.001), and mean number of oocytes were 27.55 +/- 13.46 versus 11.67 +/- 5.76 (P < 0.001) for the study and control group, respectively. Major complications and hospitalization rates were similar between the study and control groups (three [1.25%] versus one [0.4 8%]; P = 0.62 and three [1.25%] versus two [0.96%]; P = 1.0, respectively). Thirty-six patients (15.1%) in the study group and 11 (5.3%) in the control group sought medical care after retrieval, mostly due to abdominal pain, without the need for further workup or hospitalization (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Extremely high oestradiol levels were not associated with thromboembolic events, higher major complication or hospitalization rates, and therefore may be considered safe. Nevertheless, patients may be informed of possible higher rates of discomfort, mostly abdominal pain. Larger studies are warranted to confirm our results.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 526
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Withdrawal of GnRH agonist decreases oestradiol and VEGF concentrations in high responders
    Ding, Li-Jun
    Wang, Bin
    Shen, Xiao-Yue
    Yan, Gui-Jun
    Zhang, Ning-Yuan
    Hu, Ya-Li
    Sun, Hai-Xiang
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2013, 27 (02) : 131 - 139
  • [2] Retrospective comparison of GnRH agonist trigger with HCG trigger in GnRH antagonist cycles in anticipated high-responders
    Datta, Adrija Kumar
    Eapen, Abey
    Birch, Heidi
    Kurinchi-Selvan, Anitha
    Lockwood, Gillian
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2014, 29 (05) : 552 - 558
  • [3] Effect of HCG-day serum progesterone and oestradiol concentrations on pregnancy outcomes in GnRH agonist cycles
    Wu, Ze
    Li, Rong
    Ma, Yanping
    Deng, Bo
    Zhang, Xiaomei
    Meng, Yushi
    Chen, Xinna
    Liu, Ping
    Qiao, Jie
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2012, 24 (05) : 511 - 520
  • [4] GnRH agonist (GnRHa) trigger in antagonist protocol cycles: incidence of failed trigger and impact of different GnRH agonist doses
    Palumbo, A.
    Sanabria, V.
    Rouleau, J. P.
    Puopolo, M.
    Hernandez, M. J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 : 349 - 350
  • [5] GnRH agonist trigger versus hCG trigger in GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI cycles: A review article
    Alyasin, Ashraf
    Mehdinejadiani, Shayesteh
    Ghasemi, Marzieh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2016, 14 (09) : 557 - 566
  • [6] Measurement of endogenous LH surge after GnRH agonist trigger in GnRH antagonist cycles to predict trigger failure
    Rouleau, J. P.
    Garcia-Guzman, C. R.
    Hernandez, J.
    Garcia Sanchez, R.
    Gonzalez Aleman, L.
    Puopolo, M.
    Palumbo, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 : 26 - 26
  • [7] EFFECT OF ELEVATED PROGESTERONE ON THE DAY OF TRIGGER AND PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN GNRH AGONIST TRIGGER CYCLES
    Connell, M. T.
    Patounakis, G.
    Healy, M. W.
    DeCherney, A.
    Devine, K.
    Widra, E. A.
    Hill, M. J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E24 - E24
  • [8] GnRH agonist trigger for the induction of oocyte maturation in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles: a SWOT analysis
    Engmann, Lawrence
    Benadiva, Claudio
    Humaidan, Peter
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2016, 32 (03) : 274 - 285
  • [9] Follicular GnRH agonist challenge test (FACT) to predict suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger in oocyte cryopreservation cycles
    Avraham, S.
    Youngster, M.
    Gil, Y.
    Yekaternia, B.
    Gat, I.
    Kedem, A.
    Yaakov, O.
    Gidoni, Y.
    Barkat, J.
    Baruchin, O.
    Hourvitz, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [10] Luteal phase oestradiol administration in ovarian stimulation cycles with GnRH antagonist is comparable to the GnRH agonist (long) protocol
    Filho, J. S. Cunha
    Terres, L. F.
    Holanda, F.
    Freitas, F.
    Glitz, C.
    Genro, V. K.
    Arbo, E.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2007, 24 (08) : 326 - 330