Evaluating the Representation of Tropical Stratocumulus and Shallow Cumulus Clouds As Well As Their Radiative Effects in CMIP6 Models Using Satellite Observations

被引:4
|
作者
Crnivec, Nina [1 ,2 ]
Cesana, Gregory [1 ,2 ]
Pincus, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Ctr Climate Syst Res, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] NASA Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, Palisades, NY USA
关键词
marine tropical low clouds; stratocumulus; shallow cumulus; radiative effects; climate model validation; satellite observations; A-TRAIN; HEATING RATES; CALIPSO; WEATHER; PARAMETERIZATION; SIMULATIONS; VARIABILITY; MISSION; LAYER; BIAS;
D O I
10.1029/2022JD038437
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Low clouds over tropical oceans reflect a great proportion of solar radiation back to space and thereby cool the Earth, yet this phenomenon has been poorly simulated in several previous generations of climate models. The principal aim of the present study is to employ satellite observations to evaluate the representation of marine tropical low clouds and their radiative effect at the top of the atmosphere in a subset of latest climate models participating in CMIP6. We strive for regime-oriented model validation and hence introduce a qualitative approach to discriminate stratocumulus (Sc) from shallow cumulus (Cu). The novel Sc-Cu categorization has a conceptual advantage of being based on cloud properties, rather than relying on a model response to a cloud-controlling factor. We find that CMIP6 models underestimate low-cloud cover in both Sc-regions and Cu-regions of tropical oceans. A more detailed investigation of cloud biases reveals that most CMIP6 models underestimate the relative frequency of occurrence (RFO) of Sc and overestimate RFO of Cu. We further demonstrate that tropical low cloudiness in CMIP6 models remains too bright. The regime-oriented validation represents the basis for improving parameterizations of physical processes that determine the cloud cover and radiative impact of Sc and Cu, which are still misrepresented in current climate models. Similar as white snow and ice caps, bright low clouds have a high shortwave albedo, reflecting a huge amount of sunlight back to space and thereby helping us counteract global warming. The shadowing effect of bright low clouds is especially pronounced over tropical oceans, since equatorial regions of our planet receive most sunshine, which is in clear skies otherwise practically entirely absorbed within the contrastingly dark ocean. Climate models had traditionally struggled simulating these clouds by underestimating their areal extent and simultaneously overestimating their reflectivity. In other words, simulated clouds were commonly found to be "too few" and "too bright" compared to observations, which introduced a substantial uncertainty to climate projections. Herein, we proposed a novel approach to proficiently decompose tropical low cloudiness into stratocumulus and shallow cumulus regime, which is essential to provide a proper guidance for climate model development. We subsequently showed that the newest generation of climate models still suffers from the "too few, too bright" tropical low-cloud problem within both stratocumulus and shallow cumulus regimes, which thus needs to be further tackled with the greatest possible endeavor. We introduce a new approach to distinguish stratocumulus and shallow cumulus regimes over tropical oceans based on cloud coverThe "too few, too bright" tropical low-cloud problem persists in 12 CMIP6 models within stratocumulus and shallow cumulus regimesMost CMIP6 models underestimate (overestimate) the relative frequency of occurrence of stratocumulus (shallow cumulus)
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An observation-based method to assess tropical stratocumulus and shallow cumulus clouds and feedbacks in CMIP6 and CMIP5 models
    Cesana, G., V
    Ackerman, A. S.
    Crnivec, N.
    Pincus, R.
    Chepfer, H.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 5 (04):
  • [2] An evaluation of the Arctic clouds and surface radiative fluxes in CMIP6 models
    Jianfen Wei
    Zhaomin Wang
    Mingyi Gu
    Jing-Jia Luo
    Yunhe Wang
    Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2021, 40 (01) : 85 - 102
  • [3] An evaluation of the Arctic clouds and surface radiative fluxes in CMIP6 models
    Jianfen Wei
    Zhaomin Wang
    Mingyi Gu
    Jing-Jia Luo
    Yunhe Wang
    Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2021, 40 : 85 - 102
  • [4] An evaluation of the Arctic clouds and surface radiative fluxes in CMIP6 models
    Wei, Jianfen
    Wang, Zhaomin
    Gu, Mingyi
    Luo, Jing-Jia
    Wang, Yunhe
    ACTA OCEANOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 40 (01) : 85 - 102
  • [5] A Regime-Based Investigation Into the Errors of CMIP6 Simulated Cloud Radiative Effects Using Satellite Observations
    Miao, Hao
    Wang, Xiaocong
    Liu, Yimin
    Wu, Guoxiong
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (18)
  • [6] Evaluating Tropical Precipitation Relations in CMIP6 Models with ARM Data
    Emmenegger, Todd
    Kuo, Yi-Hung
    Xie, Shaocheng
    Zhang, Chengzhu
    Tao, Cheng
    Neelin, J. David
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2022, 35 (19) : 2743 - 2760
  • [7] Evaluating the Diurnal and Semidiurnal Cycle of Precipitation in CMIP6 Models Using Satellite- and Ground-Based Observations
    Tang, Shuaiqi
    Gleckler, Peter
    Xie, Shaocheng
    Lee, Jiwoo
    Ahn, Min-Seop
    Covey, Curt
    Zhang, Chengzhu
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (08) : 3189 - 3210
  • [8] An Evaluation of CMIP6 Models in Representing the Biophysical Effects of Deforestation With Satellite-Based Observations
    Luo, Xing
    Ge, Jun
    Guo, Weidong
    Cao, Yipeng
    Liu, Yu
    Chen, Chaorong
    Yang, Limei
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2023, 128 (12)
  • [9] Evaluation of the CMIP6 planetary albedo climatology using satellite observations
    Jian, Bida
    Li, Jiming
    Zhao, Yuxin
    He, Yongli
    Wang, Jing
    Huang, Jianping
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2020, 54 (11-12) : 5145 - 5161
  • [10] Evaluation of the CMIP6 planetary albedo climatology using satellite observations
    Bida Jian
    Jiming Li
    Yuxin Zhao
    Yongli He
    Jing Wang
    Jianping Huang
    Climate Dynamics, 2020, 54 : 5145 - 5161