Multiresidue analysis of pesticides in four different pomegranate cultivars: Investigating matrix effect variability by GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS

被引:27
|
作者
Damale, Rahul D. [1 ,2 ]
Dutta, Anirban [3 ]
Shaikh, Nasiruddin [1 ]
Pardeshi, Anita [1 ]
Shinde, Raviraj [1 ]
Babu, K. Dhinesh [2 ]
Gaikwad, Nilesh N. [2 ]
Banerjee, Kaushik [1 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Natl Res Ctr Grapes, Natl Reference Lab, PO Manjri Farm, Pune 412307, India
[2] ICAR Natl Res Ctr Pomegranate, Solapur 413255, India
[3] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Agr Chem, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
Matrix effects; Recovery; Pomegranate cultivars; Multiresidue analysis; GC-MS; MS; LC-MS; MASS-SPECTROMETRY ANALYSIS; ETHYL-ACETATE EXTRACTION; GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; LIQUID; PERFORMANCE; FRUITS; FOOD; ENHANCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135179
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Matrix effect (ME) is unavoidable in multiresidue pesticide analysis, even when using highly advanced in-struments, and differences in MEs can affect residue analytical accuracy due to pomegranate cultivar composi-tion variations. However, literature to support this claim is limited. The study used GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS to investigate four different Indian pomegranate cultivar extracts and their MEs on multi-class pesticides. The whole fruit and arils of all cultivars were tested for 22 GC-amenable and 21 LC-amenable pesticides. Principal component analysis of the data confirmed that each cultivar had unique MEs for each pesticide. The majority of pesticides showed acute variations in recovery rates with 95% confidence, while GC-MS/MS-amenable pesticides showed more variation. Although extrapolative dilution reduced the influence of MEs on analytical accuracy, a generalized matrix-matching for all cultivars was not possible to achieve. To reduce the variability in MEs, it is recommended that a cultivar-specific matrix-matched standard should be used.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiresidue Analysis of Pesticides in Moringa Pods by GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS
    Dutta, Anirban
    Hingmire, Sandip
    Banerjee, Kaushik
    JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 103 (06) : 1486 - 1497
  • [2] Multiresidue pesticide analysis of botanical dietary supplements by GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS
    Shi, Feng
    Wong, Jon W.
    Zhang, Kai
    Hayward, Douglas G.
    Begley, Timothy H.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 240
  • [3] Multiresidue Analysis of Pesticides by Electrospray LC-MS and LC-MS-MS
    Volmer, D. A.
    Vollmer, D. L.
    Wilkes, J. G.
    LG -GC, 1996, 14 (03):
  • [4] Multiresidue analysis of pesticides by electrospray LC-MS and LC-MS-MS
    Volmer, DA
    Vollmer, DL
    Wilkes, JG
    LC GC-MAGAZINE OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 1996, 14 (03): : 216 - &
  • [5] Analysis of neurosterols by GC-MS and LC-MS/MS
    Griffiths, William J.
    Wang, Yuqin
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2009, 877 (26): : 2778 - 2805
  • [6] Finding of pesticides in fashionable fruit juices by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS
    Tran, Kevin
    Eide, David
    Nickols, Susan M.
    Cromer, Michele R.
    Sabaa-Srur, Armando
    Smith, Robert E.
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2012, 134 (04) : 2398 - 2405
  • [7] Determination of 355 Pesticides in Lemon and Lemon Juice by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS
    Aslantas, Sule
    Golge, Ozgur
    Gonzalez-Curbelo, Miguel Angel
    Kabak, Bulent
    FOODS, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [8] LC-MS/MS AND GC-MS(/MS) BASED STEROIDOMICS
    Wudy, S. A.
    Sanchez-Guijo, A.
    Hartmann, M. F.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2014, 49 : 47 - 47
  • [9] Residue analysis of 500 high priority pesticides: Better by GC-MS or LC-MS/MS?
    Alder, Lutz
    Greulich, Kerstin
    Kempe, Guenther
    Vieth, Barbel
    MASS SPECTROMETRY REVIEWS, 2006, 25 (06) : 838 - 865
  • [10] Comparison of GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the analysis of hormones and pesticides in surface waters: advantages and pitfalls
    He, Ping
    Aga, Diana S.
    ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2019, 11 (11) : 1436 - 1448