Assessing the agreement between the partners at care transitions measure and the care transitions measure for elderly patients with chronic diseases

被引:3
|
作者
Liu, La-mei [1 ]
Sun, Meng-jie [1 ]
Liu, Meng-ting [1 ]
Wang, Jia-nan [1 ]
Zhang, Yi-zhen [2 ]
Dela Rosa, Ronnell D. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Nursing & Hlth, 100 Sci Ave, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Shanxi Bethune Hosp, 99 Longcheng St, Taiyuan 030032, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Philippine Womens Univ, Sch Nursing, Taft Ave, Manila 1004, Philippines
[4] Bataan Peninsula State Univ, Coll Nursing & Midwifery, Bataan 2100, Philippines
关键词
Elderly; Chronic diseases; Transitional care; Quality of care; Instrument; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09228-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundElderly patients with chronic diseases are very vulnerable during the transition from hospital to home and have a high need for transitional care. The quality of transitional care is closely related to patient health outcomes. Using appropriate scales to evaluate the quality of transitional care is important for efforts aimed at improving it. The study aimed to analyze the consistency between the Chinese version of the Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M) and the Care Transition Measure (CTM) in assessing the quality of transition care in elderly patients with chronic diseases.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study, we used a convenience sampling method to investigate patients with chronic diseases aged >= 65 years who were about to be discharged from the three affiliated hospitals of Zhengzhou University in Henan Province, from August 2021 to May 2022. The sample consisted of 196 elderly patients with chronic diseases. Data were collected using a demographic survey, PACT-M, and CTM. We used EpiData 3.1 software for systematic logical error checking, SPSS 21.0 to analyze the data, and the Bland-Altman analysis to analyze the consistency of the two scales.ResultsThe mean total scores for PACT-M and CTM were 65.52 +/- 6.23 and 52.07 +/- 7.26, respectively. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean difference and ratios were (-31.52, 4.61) and (0.85, 1.72), with 3.57% and 5.10% of the points outside the 95% CI limits, separately.ConclusionsThe difference analysis of Bland-Altman showed a good consistency of the two scales, while the rate analysis did not meet the a priori definition of good consistency, but it is very close to 5%. Therefore, the consistency of the two scales in assessing the quality of transitional care for elderly patients with chronic diseases needs to be further validated.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the agreement between the partners at care transitions measure and the care transitions measure for elderly patients with chronic diseases
    La-mei Liu
    Meng-jie Sun
    Meng-ting Liu
    Jia-nan Wang
    Yi-zhen Zhang
    Ronnell D Dela Rosa
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [2] Validation of the Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M): assessing the quality and safety of care transitions for older people in the UK
    Eirini Oikonomou
    Bethan Page
    Rebecca Lawton
    Jenni Murray
    Helen Higham
    Charles Vincent
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [3] Validation of the Partners at Care Transitions Measure (PACT-M): assessing the quality and safety of care transitions for older people in the UK
    Oikonomou, Eirini
    Page, Bethan
    Lawton, Rebecca
    Murray, Jenni
    Higham, Helen
    Vincent, Charles
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [4] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure
    Liu, La-mei
    Liu, Ment-ting
    Sun, Meng-jie
    Wang, Jia-nan
    Lin, Bei-lei
    Wang, Peng
    Li, Qiu-fang
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [5] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the partners at care transitions measure
    La-mei Liu
    Ment-ting Liu
    Meng-jie Sun
    Jia-nan Wang
    Bei-lei Lin
    Peng Wang
    Qiu-fang Li
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [6] Assessing the quality of transitional care - Further applications of the care transitions measure
    Parry, Carla
    Mahoney, Eldon
    Chalmers, Sandra A.
    Coleman, Eric A.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2008, 46 (03) : 317 - 322
  • [7] Measuring care transitions in Sweden: validation of the care transitions measure
    Flink, Maria
    Tessma, Mesfin
    Smastuen, Milada Cvancarova
    Lindblad, Marlene
    Coleman, Eric A.
    Ekstedt, Mirjam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 30 (04) : 291 - 297
  • [8] Measuring the quality of transitional care based on elderly patients’ experiences with the partners at care transitions measure: a cross-sectional survey
    La-Mei Liu
    Meng-Yao Zhuansun
    Tong-Yao Xu
    Yu-Meng Qian
    Hui-Qin Zhang
    Qi-Han Zhang
    Yi-Zhen Zhang
    BMC Nursing, 23
  • [9] Measuring the quality of transitional care based on elderly patients' experiences with the partners at care transitions measure: a cross-sectional survey
    Liu, La-Mei
    Zhuansun, Meng-Yao
    Xu, Tong-Yao
    Qian, Yu-Meng
    Zhang, Hui-Qin
    Zhang, Qi-Han
    Zhang, Yi-Zhen
    BMC NURSING, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [10] Care Transitions Measure and Readmissions
    Amanda S. Mixon
    Sunil Kripalani
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2017, 32 : 20 - 20