Towards an integrated framework for understanding social-ecological interactions: nature's contributions to people meets cultural ecosystem services

被引:1
|
作者
Zoeller, Kim C. [1 ,2 ]
Cumming, Graeme S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, ARC Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Australia
[2] CSIRO Environm, Brisbane, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia Perth, Oceans Inst, Crawley, Australia
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Sander Jacobs; Values; place-based knowledge; IPBES; ecosystem services; cultural ecosystem services; birdwatching; IPBES CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; RELATIONAL VALUES; VALUATION; TYPOLOGY; SYSTEMS; URBAN; WORK; LIFE;
D O I
10.1080/26395916.2024.2329576
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The social and cultural elements of human interactions with nature remain among the least-studied and least understood elements of social-ecological systems. Although the conceptual framework of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) provides an entry point into assessing nature's contributions to people (NCP), at face value IPBES has limited capacity to capture subjective elements of values and culture as influences on important socio-cultural processes that underpin social-ecological interactions. We propose that integrating cultural ecosystem services more explicitly into the IPBES conceptual framework can help fill its existing gaps by 1) elucidating the social-cultural mechanisms that underpin the production and valuation of non-material NCP, 2) explaining the role of heterogeneity in cultural, social and environmental processes, 3) identifying the two-way interactions between nature and people that co-produce NCP, and 4) identifying synergies between the IPBES conceptual framework and the cultural ecosystem services approach that will facilitate the application of the IPBES framework in more diverse settings. We use recently published work on cultural ecosystem services associated with birds to illustrate our suggestions in action. Assessing social-ecological systems through this adapted framework makes implicit connections easier to draw out, thereby providing holistic insight into the feedbacks and linkages that should be considered at all levels of environmental decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Disentangling ?ecosystem services? and ?nature?s contributions to people?
    Kadykalo, Andrew N.
    Lopez-Rodriguez, Maria D.
    Ainscough, Jacob
    Droste, Nils
    Ryu, Hyeonju
    Avila-Flores, Giovanni
    Le Clec'h, Solen
    Munoz, Marcia C.
    Nilsson, Lovisa
    Rana, Sakshi
    Sarkar, Priyanka
    Sevecke, Katharina J.
    Harmackova, Zuzana, V
    ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2019, 15 (01) : 269 - 287
  • [2] Towards a Conceptual Framework for Social-Ecological Systems Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services with Resource Efficiency Indicators
    Eisenmenger, Nina
    Giljum, Stefan
    Lutter, Stephan
    Marques, Alexandra
    Theurl, Michaela C.
    Pereira, Henrique M.
    Tukker, Arnold
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (03)
  • [3] Monitor social-ecological systems to achieve global goals for biodiversity and nature's contributions to people
    Vari, Agnes
    Gonzalez, Andrew
    Bennett, Elena M.
    BIOSCIENCE, 2025,
  • [4] Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services in a transhumance social-ecological network
    Elisa Oteros-Rozas
    Berta Martín-López
    José A. González
    Tobias Plieninger
    César A. López
    Carlos Montes
    Regional Environmental Change, 2014, 14 : 1269 - 1289
  • [5] Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services in a transhumance social-ecological network
    Oteros-Rozas, Elisa
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Gonzalez, Jose A.
    Plieninger, Tobias
    Lopez, Cesar A.
    Montes, Carlos
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2014, 14 (04) : 1269 - 1289
  • [6] Pivotal cultural values of nature cannot be integrated into the ecosystem services framework
    Kirchhoff, Thomas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (46) : E3146 - E3146
  • [7] Understanding social-ecological interdependence using ecosystem services perspective in Bhutan, Eastern Himalayas
    Kandel, Pratikshya
    Tshering, Dago
    Uddin, Kabir
    Lhamtshok, Tshering
    Aryal, Kamal
    Karki, Seema
    Sharma, Bikash
    Chettri, Nakul
    ECOSPHERE, 2018, 9 (02):
  • [8] Integrating multiple perspectives on payments for ecosystem services through a social-ecological systems framework
    Bennett, Drew E.
    Gosnell, Hannah
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 116 : 172 - 181
  • [9] Cultural ecosystem services provided by rivers across diverse social-ecological landscapes: A social media analysis
    Hale, Rebecca L.
    Cook, Elizabeth M.
    Beltran, Bray J.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 107
  • [10] A framework for integrating ecosystem services indicators into vulnerability and risk assessments of deltaic social-ecological systems
    Peng, Yuting
    Welden, Natalie
    Renaud, Fabrice G.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 326